These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8865632)

  • 1. A comparison of t test, F test, and coherence methods of detecting steady-state auditory-evoked potentials, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinusoids.
    Dobie RA; Wilson MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2236-46. PubMed ID: 8865632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection efficiency of auditory steady state evoked by modulated noise.
    Santos TS; Silva JJ; Lins OG; Melges DB; Tierra-Criollo CJ
    Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():125-31. PubMed ID: 27262450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.
    Putterman DB; Keefe DH; Hunter LL; Garinis AC; Fitzpatrick DF; McMillan GP; Feeney MP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28437273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved Detection of Vowel Envelope Frequency Following Responses Using Hotelling's T2 Analysis.
    Vanheusden FJ; Bell SL; Chesnaye MA; Simpson DM
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):116-127. PubMed ID: 29757799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the power of objective response detection of evoked responses in noise by using average and product of magnitude-squared coherence of two different signals.
    Zanotelli T; Leite Miranda de Sá AMF; Mendes EMAM; Felix LB
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Oct; 57(10):2203-2214. PubMed ID: 31399896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective detection of 40 Hz auditory evoked potentials: phase coherence vs. magnitude-squared coherence.
    Dobie RA; Wilson MJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Sep; 92(5):405-13. PubMed ID: 7523084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrocochleography is more sensitive than distortion-product otoacoustic emission test for detecting noise-induced temporary threshold shift.
    Kim JS; Nam EC; Park SI
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Oct; 133(4):619-24. PubMed ID: 16213939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A study on the correlation between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions].
    Xue X; Zhong N
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Apr; 17(4):198-200. PubMed ID: 12838856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling signal-to-noise ratio of otoacoustic emissions in workers exposed to different industrial noise levels.
    Nassiri P; Zare S; Monazzam MR; Pourbakht A; Azam K; Golmohammadi T
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(85):391-398. PubMed ID: 27991472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic validity of dichotic multiple frequencies auditory steady-state responses versus distortion product otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high risk neonates.
    Mahmoudian S; Farhadi M; Kadivar M; Ghalehbaghi B; Rahimi F; Hemami MR; Kamrava SK; Asghari A; Amintehran E; Mohagheghi P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 75(9):1109-16. PubMed ID: 21719120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.
    Meha-Bettison K; Sharma M; Ibrahim RK; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 28971719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing threshold estimation using concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady-state responses.
    Rosner T; Kandzia F; Oswald JA; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):840-51. PubMed ID: 21361442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multichannel search strategy for improving the detection of auditory steady-state response.
    Antunes F; Zanotelli T; Simpson DM; Felix LB
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2021 Feb; 59(2):391-399. PubMed ID: 33495982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions hearing screening in high-risk newborns.
    Salata JA; Jacobson JT; Strasnick B
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 Jan; 118(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 9450826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Small SA; Sharma M; Bradford M; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 28863034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Distortion product of otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss].
    Schlögel H; Stephan K; Böheim K; Welzl-Müller K
    HNO; 1995 Jan; 43(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 7890546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Notched-noise-BERA: methods and diagnostic use].
    Schönweiler R; Raap M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2007 May; 86(5):336-44. PubMed ID: 17514785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.