428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8866262)
1. Secondary caries formation in vitro around glass ionomer-lined amalgam and composite restorations.
Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Papadogianis Y
J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Aug; 23(8):511-9. PubMed ID: 8866262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Artificial recurrent caries in glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations.
Garcia-Godoy F; Jesen ME
Am J Dent; 1990 Jun; 3(3):89-93. PubMed ID: 2076235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fluoride-releasing resin bonding of amalgam restorations in primary teeth: in vitro secondary caries effect.
Hicks J; Milano M; Seybold S; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C
Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 12691270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer.
Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1437685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial root caries in amalgam restorations: effect of light-cured fluoride releasing liners.
Jensen ME; Garcia-Godoy F; Wefel JS
Am J Dent; 1990 Dec; 3(6):295-8. PubMed ID: 2095808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Artificial secondary caries around two new F-containing restoratives.
Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Papadogiannis Y; Konstantinidis A
Oper Dent; 1998; 23(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 9573793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of the XR-bonding system on in vitro caries.
Swift EJ; Linden JJ; Wefel JS
Am J Dent; 1991 Aug; 4(4):157-61. PubMed ID: 1930838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage evaluation in amalgam restorations used with bases.
Wieczkowski G; Yu XY; Joynt RB; Davis EL
J Esthet Dent; 1992; 4(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 1389340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
