117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 886632)
1. Extrapolation of animal studies to the human situation.
Zapp JA
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1977 Jul; 2(6):1425-33. PubMed ID: 886632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of mathematical models used in data extrapolation.
Jones HB; Grendon A
Clin Toxicol; 1976; 9(5):791-7. PubMed ID: 1000906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Extrapolation to humans of the results of carcinogenicity tests].
Turusov VS; Parfenov IuD
Vopr Onkol; 1984; 30(6):3-16. PubMed ID: 6377689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Extrapolation of cellular and molecular level studies to the human situation.
Magee PN
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1977 Jul; 2(6):1415-24. PubMed ID: 328924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationships between laboratory and human studies.
Clayson DB
J Environ Pathol Toxicol; 1977; 1(2):31-40. PubMed ID: 553139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of data from short-term tests in the evaluation of the carcinogenicity of environmental chemicals to humans.
Yamasaki H; Wilbourn JD; Haroun L
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1982; 109():169-80. PubMed ID: 7167540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Urgent problems of hygienic standards for carcinogenic substances].
Sidorenko GI; Litvinov NN
Gig Sanit; 1977 Feb; (2):82-8. PubMed ID: 852697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Certain prospects for solving the problem of reservoir pollution by carcinogenic substances].
Il'nitskiĭ AP; Khudoleĭ VV; Savluchinskaia LA
Gig Sanit; 1980 Jun; (6):19-22. PubMed ID: 7429201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cancer risk assessment of direct acting carcinogens.
Zito R
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 1999 Sep; 18(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 10606168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Environmental determinants of human cancer.
Epstein SS
Cancer Res; 1974 Oct; 34(10):2425-35. PubMed ID: 4606519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The predictive value of rodent carcinogenicity tests in the evaluation of human risks.
Tomatis L
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol; 1979; 19():511-30. PubMed ID: 378109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Laboratory approaches to the identification of carcinogens.
Bates RR
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1976; 271():29-38. PubMed ID: 1069516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The predictability of bioassays.
Anderson D
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1982; 109():149-68. PubMed ID: 6891964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Overview of some aspects of quantitative risk assessment.
Fishbein L
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1980; 6(5-6):1275-96. PubMed ID: 7007657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of food safety.
Doull J
Fed Proc; 1978 Oct; 37(12):2594-7. PubMed ID: 700168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Environmental chemical carcinogenesis.
Stewart BW; Sarfaty GA
Med J Aust; 1978 Jan; 1(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 651714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Current status of the problem of testing drugs for carcinogenicity].
Shashkina LF; Ivanova VM; Liubimov BI
Farmakol Toksikol; 1985; 48(3):107-13. PubMed ID: 3896842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Species differences in carcinogen metabolism and interspecies extrapolation.
Dybing E; Huitfeldt HS
IARC Sci Publ; 1992; (116):501-22. PubMed ID: 1428094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the use of linear low-dose extrapolation still justified for carcinogens?
Clayson DB
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Aug; 28(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 9784436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Extrapolating carcinogenesis data from animals to humans.
Falk HL
Fed Proc; 1980 Jan; 39(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 6985871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
