394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8868499)
1. Legislating to preserve women's autonomy during pregnancy.
Feitshans IL
Med Law; 1995; 14(5-6):397-412. PubMed ID: 8868499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality.
Shakespeare T
Disabil Soc; 1998 Nov; 13(5):665-81. PubMed ID: 11660717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A new threat to pregnant women's autonomy.
Johnsen D
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(4):33-40. PubMed ID: 3667248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. AIDS and the future of reproductive freedom.
Bayer R
Milbank Q; 1990; 68(Suppl. 2):179-204. PubMed ID: 11653914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproductive rights and the Human Genome Project.
Walsh J
South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1994; 4(1):145-81. PubMed ID: 11660643
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Legal and ethical issues in genetic testing and counseling for susceptibility to breast, ovarian and colon cancer.
Dickens BM; Pei N; Taylor KM
CMAJ; 1996 Mar; 154(6):813-8. PubMed ID: 8634959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mother v. her unborn child: where should Texas draw the line?
Locke NJ
Houst Law Rev; 1987 May; 24(3):549-76. PubMed ID: 11649225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Resisting the temptation to turn medical recommendations into judicial orders: a reconsideration of court-ordered surgery for pregnant women.
Scott C
Ga State Univ Law Rev; 1994 May; 10(4):615-89. PubMed ID: 11656420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. International perspectives on ethics and human genetics.
Wertz DC
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1411-56. PubMed ID: 11657044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive health and blurred professional boundaries.
Chavkin W; Breitbart V
Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 8932462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Controlling HIV-positive women's procreative destiny: a critical equal protection analysis.
Weiss JS
Const Law J; 1992; 2(2):643-718. PubMed ID: 11651626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Feminist criticism of prenatal diagnosis: a response.
Wertz DC; Fletcher JC
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 36(3):541-67. PubMed ID: 8403604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Female self-determination between feminist claims and 'voluntary' eugenics, between 'rights' and ethics.
Degener T
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 11650920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Women's right to health and Ireland's abortion laws.
Taylor M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Jul; 130(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 25939525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Access to reproductive genetic services for low-income women and women of color.
Nsiah-Jefferson L
Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):107-27. PubMed ID: 11653012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When pregnant patients refuse interventions.
Tauer CA
AWHONNS Clin Issues Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1993; 4(4):596-605. PubMed ID: 8220374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Politics of reproduction: a view from Israel on the Dobbs decision.
Shalev C
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2023 Jan; 12(1):3. PubMed ID: 36694241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Emerging notions of women's rights and responsibilities during gestation.
Blank RH
J Leg Med; 1986 Dec; 7(4):441-69. PubMed ID: 3492583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fostering Informed Choice: Alleviating the Trauma of Genetic Abortions.
Asbury BD
Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2015; 25(2):293-333. PubMed ID: 27224969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate.
Bennett B
Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]