BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8868499)

  • 1. Legislating to preserve women's autonomy during pregnancy.
    Feitshans IL
    Med Law; 1995; 14(5-6):397-412. PubMed ID: 8868499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality.
    Shakespeare T
    Disabil Soc; 1998 Nov; 13(5):665-81. PubMed ID: 11660717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new threat to pregnant women's autonomy.
    Johnsen D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(4):33-40. PubMed ID: 3667248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AIDS and the future of reproductive freedom.
    Bayer R
    Milbank Q; 1990; 68(Suppl. 2):179-204. PubMed ID: 11653914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproductive rights and the Human Genome Project.
    Walsh J
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1994; 4(1):145-81. PubMed ID: 11660643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Legal and ethical issues in genetic testing and counseling for susceptibility to breast, ovarian and colon cancer.
    Dickens BM; Pei N; Taylor KM
    CMAJ; 1996 Mar; 154(6):813-8. PubMed ID: 8634959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mother v. her unborn child: where should Texas draw the line?
    Locke NJ
    Houst Law Rev; 1987 May; 24(3):549-76. PubMed ID: 11649225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Resisting the temptation to turn medical recommendations into judicial orders: a reconsideration of court-ordered surgery for pregnant women.
    Scott C
    Ga State Univ Law Rev; 1994 May; 10(4):615-89. PubMed ID: 11656420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. International perspectives on ethics and human genetics.
    Wertz DC
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1411-56. PubMed ID: 11657044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproductive health and blurred professional boundaries.
    Chavkin W; Breitbart V
    Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 8932462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controlling HIV-positive women's procreative destiny: a critical equal protection analysis.
    Weiss JS
    Const Law J; 1992; 2(2):643-718. PubMed ID: 11651626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feminist criticism of prenatal diagnosis: a response.
    Wertz DC; Fletcher JC
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 36(3):541-67. PubMed ID: 8403604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Female self-determination between feminist claims and 'voluntary' eugenics, between 'rights' and ethics.
    Degener T
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 11650920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Women's right to health and Ireland's abortion laws.
    Taylor M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Jul; 130(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 25939525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Access to reproductive genetic services for low-income women and women of color.
    Nsiah-Jefferson L
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):107-27. PubMed ID: 11653012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When pregnant patients refuse interventions.
    Tauer CA
    AWHONNS Clin Issues Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1993; 4(4):596-605. PubMed ID: 8220374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Politics of reproduction: a view from Israel on the Dobbs decision.
    Shalev C
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2023 Jan; 12(1):3. PubMed ID: 36694241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Emerging notions of women's rights and responsibilities during gestation.
    Blank RH
    J Leg Med; 1986 Dec; 7(4):441-69. PubMed ID: 3492583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fostering Informed Choice: Alleviating the Trauma of Genetic Abortions.
    Asbury BD
    Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2015; 25(2):293-333. PubMed ID: 27224969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate.
    Bennett B
    Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.