These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8869984)

  • 1. The role of context in reading with central field loss.
    Fine EM; Peli E
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Aug; 73(8):533-9. PubMed ID: 8869984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are the benefits of sentence context different in central and peripheral vision?
    Fine EM; Hazel CA; Petre KL; Rubin GS
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Nov; 76(11):764-9. PubMed ID: 10566861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulated cataract does not reduce the benefit of RSVP.
    Fine EM; Peli E; Reeves A
    Vision Res; 1997 Sep; 37(18):2639-47. PubMed ID: 9373694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low-vision patients with age-related maculopathy read RSVP faster when word duration varies according to word length.
    Aquilante K; Yager D; Morris RA; Khmelnitsky F
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 May; 78(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 11384006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of word frequency on word reading speed when individuals with macular diseases read text.
    Stolowy N; Calabrèse A; Sauvan L; Aguilar C; François T; Gala N; Matonti F; Castet E
    Vision Res; 2019 Feb; 155():1-10. PubMed ID: 30571997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The inhibitory effect of word neighborhood size when reading with central field loss is modulated by word predictability and reading proficiency.
    Sauvan L; Stolowy N; Aguilar C; François T; Gala N; Matonti F; Castet E; Calabrèse A
    Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):21792. PubMed ID: 33311546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low-vision reading speed: influences of linguistic inference and aging.
    Sass SM; Legge GE; Lee HW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 83(3):166-77. PubMed ID: 16534459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scrolled and rapid serial visual presentation texts are read at similar rates by the visually impaired.
    Fine EM; Peli E
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1995 Oct; 12(10):2286-92. PubMed ID: 7500210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The necessary field of view to read with an optimal stand magnifier.
    Fine EM; Kirschen MP; Peli E
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Jul; 67(7):382-9. PubMed ID: 8888863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low vision reading with sequential word presentation.
    Rubin GS; Turano K
    Vision Res; 1994 Jul; 34(13):1723-33. PubMed ID: 7941378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychophysics of reading. XVII. Low-vision performance with four types of electronically magnified text.
    Harland S; Legge GE; Luebker A
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Mar; 75(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 9547799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The value of Tablets as reading aids for individuals with central visual field loss: an evaluation of eccentric reading with static and scrolling text.
    Walker R; Bryan L; Harvey H; Riazi A; Anderson SJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul; 36(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 27061397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visually impaired observers require a larger window than normally sighted observers to read from a scroll display.
    Fine EM; Peli E
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Jul; 67(7):390-6. PubMed ID: 8888864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How People with Low Vision Achieve Magnification in Digital Reading.
    Granquist C; Wu YH; Gage R; Crossland MD; Legge GE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Sep; 95(9):711-719. PubMed ID: 30169350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reconciling print-size and display-size constraints on reading.
    Atilgan N; Xiong YZ; Legge GE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Dec; 117(48):30276-30284. PubMed ID: 33168745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Small effect of interline spacing on maximal reading speed in low-vision patients with central field loss irrespective of scotoma size.
    Calabrèse A; Bernard JB; Hoffart L; Faure G; Barouch F; Conrath J; Castet E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Feb; 51(2):1247-54. PubMed ID: 19834038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Difficulty with out-loud and silent reading in glaucoma.
    Ramulu PY; Swenor BK; Jefferys JL; Friedman DS; Rubin GS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):666-72. PubMed ID: 23074207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benefits of rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) over scrolled text vary with letter size.
    Fine EM; Peli E
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Mar; 75(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 9547800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Random word recognition chart helps scotoma assessment in low vision.
    MacKeben M; Nair UK; Walker LL; Fletcher DC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 92(4):421-8. PubMed ID: 25946100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancement of text for the visually impaired.
    Fine EM; Peli E
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1995 Jul; 12(7):1439-47. PubMed ID: 7608788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.