These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8870162)

  • 1. Ordinal regression methodology for ROC curves derived from correlated data.
    Toledano AY; Gatsonis C
    Stat Med; 1996 Aug; 15(16):1807-26. PubMed ID: 8870162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Generalized estimating equations for ordinal categorical data: arbitrary patterns of missing responses and missingness in a key covariate.
    Toledano AY; Gatsonis C
    Biometrics; 1999 Jun; 55(2):488-96. PubMed ID: 11318205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ROC curve regression analysis: the use of ordinal regression models for diagnostic test assessment.
    Tosteson AN; Weinstein MC; Wittenberg J; Begg CB
    Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Nov; 102 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):73-8. PubMed ID: 7851336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three methods for analysing correlated ROC curves: a comparison in real data sets from multi-reader, multi-case studies with a factorial design.
    Toledano AY
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2919-33. PubMed ID: 12953288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation.
    Tosteson AN; Begg CB
    Med Decis Making; 1988; 8(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 3294553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Solitary pulmonary nodules: meta-analytic comparison of cross-sectional imaging modalities for diagnosis of malignancy.
    Cronin P; Dwamena BA; Kelly AM; Carlos RC
    Radiology; 2008 Mar; 246(3):772-82. PubMed ID: 18235105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wilcoxon-based group sequential designs for comparison of areas under two correlated ROC curves.
    Zhou XH; Li SM; Gatsonis CA
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 17357988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CT and MR imaging in staging non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: report of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group.
    Webb WR; Gatsonis C; Zerhouni EA; Heelan RT; Glazer GM; Francis IR; McNeil BJ
    Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):705-13. PubMed ID: 1847239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continuous versus categorical data for ROC analysis: some quantitative considerations.
    Wagner RF; Beiden SV; Metz CE
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Apr; 8(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 11293781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imaging in lung cancer.
    Sarinas PS; Chitkara RK; Rizk NW; Segall GM; Stark P
    Curr Opin Pulm Med; 1996 Jul; 2(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 9363150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian hierarchical approach to multirater correlated ROC analysis.
    Johnson TD; Johnson VE
    Stat Med; 2006 Jun; 25(11):1858-71. PubMed ID: 16158405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A marginal model approach for analysis of multi-reader multi-test receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
    Song X; Zhou XH
    Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 15772108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CT and MR imaging in the local staging of primary malignant musculoskeletal neoplasms: Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group.
    Panicek DM; Gatsonis C; Rosenthal DI; Seeger LL; Huvos AG; Moore SG; Caudry DJ; Palmer WE; McNeil BJ
    Radiology; 1997 Jan; 202(1):237-46. PubMed ID: 8988217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-small cell lung cancer: whole-body MR examination for M-stage assessment--utility for whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging compared with integrated FDG PET/CT.
    Ohno Y; Koyama H; Onishi Y; Takenaka D; Nogami M; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Kotani Y; Sugimura K
    Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):643-54. PubMed ID: 18539889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T--comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance.
    Heijmink SW; Fütterer JJ; Hambrock T; Takahashi S; Scheenen TW; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Knipscheer BC; Kiemeney LA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 17495178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. TNM Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of PET/MR and PET/CT.
    Huellner MW; de Galiza Barbosa F; Husmann L; Pietsch CM; Mader CE; Burger IA; Stolzmann P; Delso G; Frauenfelder T; von Schulthess GK; Veit-Haibach P
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 26471696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 16554220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of correlated receiver operating characteristic curves derived from repeated diagnostic test data.
    Zou KH
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Mar; 8(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 11249086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonparametric and semiparametric group sequential methods for comparing accuracy of diagnostic tests.
    Tang L; Emerson SS; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2008 Dec; 64(4):1137-45. PubMed ID: 18371124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Staging of neuroblastoma at imaging: report of the radiology diagnostic oncology group.
    Siegel MJ; Ishwaran H; Fletcher BD; Meyer JS; Hoffer FA; Jaramillo D; Hernandez RJ; Roubal SE; Siegel BA; Caudry DJ; McNeil BJ
    Radiology; 2002 Apr; 223(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 11930063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.