These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8870530)

  • 1. Category typicality effects in episodic memory: testing models of distinctiveness.
    Schmidt SR
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Sep; 24(5):595-607. PubMed ID: 8870530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Typicality in the brain during semantic and episodic memory decisions.
    Delhaye E; Coco MI; Bahri MA; Raposo A
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Jun; 184():108529. PubMed ID: 36898662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are lions and tigers substitutes or associates? Evidence against slot filler accounts of children's early categorization.
    Krackow E; Gordon P
    Child Dev; 1998 Apr; 69(2):347-54. PubMed ID: 9586210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Category learning in Alzheimer's disease and normal cognitive aging depends on initial experience of feature variability.
    Phillips JS; McMillan CT; Smith EE; Grossman M
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Apr; 98():98-110. PubMed ID: 27394151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A hybrid-similarity exemplar model for predicting distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition.
    Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1194-209. PubMed ID: 14622055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When does a different environmental context make a difference in recognition? A global activation model.
    Murnane K; Phelps MP
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Sep; 22(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 7968554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect.
    Kinoshita S
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):563-71. PubMed ID: 2796741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Associative and similarity-based processes in categorization decisions.
    Hampton JA
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Sep; 25(5):625-40. PubMed ID: 9337581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinctiveness in serial memory for spatial information.
    Guérard K; Neath I; Surprenant AM; Tremblay S
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jan; 38(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 19966241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Event-related potentials of verbal encoding into episodic memory: dissociation between the effects of subsequent memory performance and distinctiveness.
    Fernández G; Weyerts H; Tendolkar I; Smid HG; Scholz M; Heinze HJ
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Nov; 35(6):709-20. PubMed ID: 9844432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognition failure of categorised words: further evidence of exceptions.
    Gardiner JM; Mäntylä T; Nilsson LG
    Memory; 1995 Mar; 3(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 8556534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A context-change account of temporal distinctiveness.
    Siefke BM; Smith TA; Sederberg PB
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1158-1172. PubMed ID: 30912034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of inhibitory processes in part-list cuing.
    Aslan A; Bäuml KH; Grundgeiger T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 17352615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The distinctiveness of the word-length effect.
    Hulme C; Neath I; Stuart G; Shostak L; Surprenant AM; Brown GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):586-94. PubMed ID: 16719668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition and frequency judgments in young and elderly adults.
    Freund JS; Witte KL
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(1):81-102. PubMed ID: 3717457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust recollection rejection in the memory conjunction paradigm.
    Lampinen JM; Odegard TN; Neuschatz JS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):332-42. PubMed ID: 14979808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Category structure and semantic priming in retarded adolescents.
    Weil CM; McCauley C; Sperber RD
    Am J Ment Defic; 1978 Sep; 83(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 696758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of category distinctiveness and stimulus relations on young children's use of retrieval clustering strategies.
    Nida RE; Lange G
    J Gen Psychol; 1995 Oct; 122(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 8530916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Category structure and created memories.
    Smith SM; Ward TB; Tindell DR; Sifonis CM; Wilkenfeld MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):386-95. PubMed ID: 10881556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Serial recall of colors: Two models of memory for serial order applied to continuous visual stimuli.
    Peteranderl S; Oberauer K
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jan; 46(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 28741252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.