BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8870764)

  • 21. The meaning of diagnostic test results: a spreadsheet for swift data analysis.
    Maceneaney PM; Malone DE
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Mar; 55(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10708618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods].
    Doyon F; Hill C
    J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 82(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 11428206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Setting sample size to ensure narrow confidence intervals for precise estimation of population values.
    Corty EW; Corty RW
    Nurs Res; 2011; 60(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 21336224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Confidence intervals for predictive values with an emphasis to case-control studies.
    Mercaldo ND; Lau KF; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(10):2170-83. PubMed ID: 16927452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using evidence to determine diagnostic test efficacy.
    Replogle WH; Johnson WD; Hoover KW
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2009; 6(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 19413584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Practical issues in equivalence trials.
    Ebbutt AF; Frith L
    Stat Med; 1998 Aug 15-30; 17(15-16):1691-701. PubMed ID: 9749440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Modified exact sample size for a binomial proportion with special emphasis on diagnostic test parameter estimation.
    Fosgate GT
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2857-66. PubMed ID: 16134167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sample size estimation in prevalence studies.
    Arya R; Antonisamy B; Kumar S
    Indian J Pediatr; 2012 Nov; 79(11):1482-8. PubMed ID: 22562262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Statistical power in breast cancer screening trials and mortality reduction among women 40-49 years of age with particular emphasis on the National Breast Screening Study of Canada.
    Kopans DB; Halpern E; Hulka CA
    Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1196-203. PubMed ID: 8055437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Validity and coverage of estimates of relative accuracy.
    Cheng H; Macaluso M; Hardin JM
    Ann Epidemiol; 2000 May; 10(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 10854959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Screening for disease: making evidence-based choices.
    Fields MM; Chevlen E
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2006 Feb; 10(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 16482730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An expert system for the calculation of sample size.
    Ebell MH; Neale AV; Hodgkins BJ
    Fam Pract Res J; 1994 Jun; 14(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 8053384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Alternative Confidence Interval Methods Used in the Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
    Erdoğan S; Gülhan OT
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():7141050. PubMed ID: 27478491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study.
    Knottnerus JA; Muris JW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2003 Nov; 56(11):1118-28. PubMed ID: 14615003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Estimation by the Hui and Walter method of the sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test in the absence of a reference test: results of a simulation study].
    Bertrand P; Benichou J; Chastang C
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1994; 42(6):502-11. PubMed ID: 7816963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validity of nutritional screening and assessment tools.
    Jones JM
    Nutrition; 2004 Mar; 20(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 14990274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparing accuracy in an unpaired post-market device study with incomplete disease assessment.
    Alonzo TA
    Biom J; 2009 Jun; 51(3):491-503. PubMed ID: 19572317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
    Drummond GB; Vowler SL
    Exp Physiol; 2013 Feb; 98(2):351-4. PubMed ID: 23349528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
    Drummond GB; Vowler SL
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2012 Dec; 39(12):991-4. PubMed ID: 23919813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
    Drummond GB; Vowler SL
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2012 Dec; 36(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 23209006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.