150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8871144)
1. Identification of individual microaneurysms: a comparison between fluorescein angiograms and red-free and colour photographs.
Hellstedt T; Vesti E; Immonen I
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1996 Aug; 234 Suppl 1():S13-7. PubMed ID: 8871144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retinal microaneurysm counts in diabetic retinopathy: colour photography versus fluorescein angiography.
Friberg TR; Lace J; Rosenstock J; Raskin P
Can J Ophthalmol; 1987 Jun; 22(4):226-9. PubMed ID: 3607597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peripheral retinal evaluation comparing fundus photographs with fluorescein angiograms in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Agardh E; Cavallin-Sjöberg U
Retina; 1998; 18(5):420-3. PubMed ID: 9801036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing diabetic retinopathy lesions in scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and colour fundus photography.
Nghiem AZ; Nderitu P; Lukic M; Khatun M; Largan R; Kortuem K; Balaskas K; Sim D
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):e1035-e1040. PubMed ID: 31286663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The normal retinal fluorescein angiogram I. A study of the fluoresceinangiographic appearance of the retina in normal subjects without ophthalmoscopically obvious pathological changes.
Nielsen NV
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1982 Oct; 60(5):657-70. PubMed ID: 7164784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of diabetic retinopathy using two-field 60 degrees fundus photography. A comparison between red-free, black-and-white prints and colour transparencies.
von Wendt G; Heikkilä K; Summanen P
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1999 Dec; 77(6):638-47. PubMed ID: 10634555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early versus late staining of microaneurysms in fluorescein angiography.
Jalli PY; Hellstedt TJ; Immonen IJ
Retina; 1997; 17(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 9196932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Disparity of microaneurysm count between ultrawide field colour imaging and ultrawide field fluorescein angiography in eyes with diabetic retinopathy.
Ashraf M; Sampani K; AbdelAl O; Fleming A; Cavallerano J; Souka A; El Baha SM; Silva PS; Sun J; Aiello LP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 104(12):1762-1767. PubMed ID: 32111607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated detection of microaneurysms in digital red-free photographs: a diabetic retinopathy screening tool.
Hipwell JH; Strachan F; Olson JA; McHardy KC; Sharp PF; Forrester JV
Diabet Med; 2000 Aug; 17(8):588-94. PubMed ID: 11073180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A computerized system for localization of diabetic lesions from fundus images.
Hellstedt T; Palsi VP; Immonen I
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1994 Jun; 72(3):352-6. PubMed ID: 7976267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated measurement of microaneurysm turnover.
Goatman KA; Cree MJ; Olson JA; Forrester JV; Sharp PF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Dec; 44(12):5335-41. PubMed ID: 14638735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fundus autofluorescence and colour fundus imaging compared during telemedicine screening in patients with diabetes.
Kolomeyer AM; Baumrind BR; Szirth BC; Shahid K; Khouri AS
J Telemed Telecare; 2013 Jun; 19(4):209-12. PubMed ID: 24163061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Automatic detection of microaneurysms in colour fundus images].
Jiménez S; Alemany P; Núñez Benjumea F; Serrano C; Acha B; Fondón I; Carral F; Sánchez C
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2011 Sep; 86(9):277-81. PubMed ID: 21893260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification of diabetic maculopathy by digital imaging of the fundus.
Phillips RP; Spencer T; Ross PG; Sharp PF; Forrester JV
Eye (Lond); 1991; 5 ( Pt 1)():130-7. PubMed ID: 2060662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visualization of microaneurysms using optical coherence tomography angiography: comparison of OCTA en face, OCT B-scan, OCT en face, FA, and IA images.
Hamada M; Ohkoshi K; Inagaki K; Ebihara N; Murakami A
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 62(2):168-175. PubMed ID: 29383540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison between one- and two-field 60 degree fundus photography when screening for diabetic retinopathy.
von Wendt G; Rönnholm P; Heikkilä K; Summanen P
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2000 Feb; 78(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 10726781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-assisted microaneurysm turnover in the early stages of diabetic retinopathy.
Bernardes R; Nunes S; Pereira I; Torrent T; Rosa A; Coelho D; Cunha-Vaz J
Ophthalmologica; 2009; 223(5):284-91. PubMed ID: 19372722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is one 60 degrees fundus photograph sufficient for screening of proliferative diabetic retinopathy?
Møller F; Hansen M; Sjølie AK
Diabetes Care; 2001 Dec; 24(12):2083-5. PubMed ID: 11723087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Disappearance and formation rates of microaneurysms in early diabetic retinopathy.
Hellstedt T; Immonen I
Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Feb; 80(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 8814743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided digitisation of fundus photographs.
Sleightholm MA; Arnold J; Aldington SJ; Kohner EM
Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1984 Nov; 5(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 6525798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
