These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8872250)

  • 21. True arterial system compliance estimated from apparent arterial compliance.
    Quick CM; Berger DS; Hettrick DA; Noordergraaf A
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2000 Mar; 28(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 10784093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. MR measurements of pulsatile pressure gradients.
    Urchuk SN; Plewes DB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(6):829-36. PubMed ID: 7865944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robustness of the P-U and lnD-U loop wave speed estimation methods: effects of the diastolic pressure decay and vessel wall non-linearities.
    Mynard JP; Davidson MR; Penny DJ; Smolich JJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():6446-9. PubMed ID: 22255814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Wave intensity analysis and the development of the reservoir-wave approach.
    Tyberg JV; Davies JE; Wang Z; Whitelaw WA; Flewitt JA; Shrive NG; Francis DP; Hughes AD; Parker KH; Wang JJ
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Feb; 47(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 19189147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Location of a reflection site is elusive: consequences for the calculation of aortic pulse wave velocity.
    Westerhof BE; van den Wijngaard JP; Murgo JP; Westerhof N
    Hypertension; 2008 Sep; 52(3):478-83. PubMed ID: 18695144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Waves in initially stressed fluid-filled thick tubes.
    Demiray H
    J Biomech; 1997 Mar; 30(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 9119827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Separation of the reservoir and wave pressure and velocity from measurements at an arbitrary location in arteries.
    Aguado-Sierra J; Alastruey J; Wang JJ; Hadjiloizou N; Davies J; Parker KH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 May; 222(4):403-16. PubMed ID: 18595353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Wave intensity amplification and attenuation in non-linear flow: implications for the calculation of local reflection coefficients.
    Mynard J; Penny DJ; Smolich JJ
    J Biomech; 2008 Dec; 41(16):3314-21. PubMed ID: 19019371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The case for the reservoir-wave approach.
    Tyberg JV; Bouwmeester JC; Parker KH; Shrive NG; Wang JJ
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 Mar; 172(2):299-306. PubMed ID: 24485224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Systolic hypertension mechanisms: effect of global and local proximal aorta stiffening on pulse pressure.
    Reymond P; Westerhof N; Stergiopulos N
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Mar; 40(3):742-9. PubMed ID: 22016326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validity of the local nonlinear arterial flow theory: influence of the upstream and downstream conditions.
    Bensalah A; Flaud P
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Nov; 30(9):1159-67. PubMed ID: 18400549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Wave reflections, assessed with a novel method for pulse wave separation, are associated with end-organ damage and clinical outcomes.
    Weber T; Wassertheurer S; Rammer M; Haiden A; Hametner B; Eber B
    Hypertension; 2012 Aug; 60(2):534-41. PubMed ID: 22585948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Wave intensity in the ascending aorta: effects of arterial occlusion.
    Khir AW; Parker KH
    J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):647-55. PubMed ID: 15713284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An experimental comparison of different methods of measuring wave propagation in viscoelastic tubes.
    Ursino M; Artioli E; Gallerani M
    J Biomech; 1994 Jul; 27(7):979-90. PubMed ID: 8063848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Wave Separation, Wave Intensity, the Reservoir-Wave Concept, and the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio: Presumptions and Principles.
    Westerhof N; Segers P; Westerhof BE
    Hypertension; 2015 Jul; 66(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 26015448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Photoplethysmography and ultrasonic-measurement-integrated simulation to clarify the relation between two-dimensional unsteady blood flow field and forward and backward waves in a carotid artery.
    Sone S; Hayase T; Funamoto K; Shirai A
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 May; 55(5):719-731. PubMed ID: 27464834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Potential and limitations of wave intensity analysis in coronary arteries.
    Siebes M; Kolyva C; Verhoeff BJ; Piek JJ; Spaan JA
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Feb; 47(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 19205771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Determination of wave speed and wave separation in the arteries.
    Khir AW; O'Brien A; Gibbs JS; Parker KH
    J Biomech; 2001 Sep; 34(9):1145-55. PubMed ID: 11506785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A velocity correlation method for measuring vascular compliance using MR imaging.
    Urchuk SN; Plewes DB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(6):628-34. PubMed ID: 8748478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pressure-flow loops and instantaneous input impedance in the thoracic aorta: another way to assess the effect of aortic bypass graft implantation on myocardial, brain, and subdiaphragmatic perfusion.
    Mekkaoui C; Rolland PH; Friggi A; Rasigni M; Mesana TG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Mar; 125(3):699-710. PubMed ID: 12658214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.