These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8872570)

  • 1. Poor reproducibility in radiographic grading of femoral cementing technique in total hip arthroplasty.
    Kelly AJ; Lee MB; Wong NS; Smith EJ; Learmonth ID
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Aug; 11(5):525-8. PubMed ID: 8872570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Femoral cement grading in total hip arthroplasty.
    Harvey EJ; Tanzer M; Bobyn JD
    J Arthroplasty; 1998 Jun; 13(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 9645519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short-term aseptic loosening of the femoral component in canine total hip replacement: effects of cementing technique on cement mantle grade.
    Ota J; Cook JL; Lewis DD; Tomlinson JL; Fox DB; Cook CR; Schultz LG; Brumitt J
    Vet Surg; 2005; 34(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16212589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
    Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of fixation of the femoral component without cement and fixation with use of a bone-vacuum cementing technique for the prevention of fat embolism during total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized clinical trial.
    Pitto RP; Koessler M; Kuehle JW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jun; 81(6):831-43. PubMed ID: 10391548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study.
    Mulroy WF; Estok DM; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Dec; 77(12):1845-52. PubMed ID: 8550652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The bone-vacuum cementing technique for the fixation of the stem in total hip arthroplasty.
    Pitto RP; Kessler M; Schikora N; di Muria GV
    Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 12025052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cement arteriovenogram after hip arthroplasty.
    Garríguez-Pérez D; García-Coiradas J; Otero-Otero J; Marco-Martínez F
    Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed); 2020; 64(6):388-392. PubMed ID: 32807695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
    Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to read a postoperative total hip replacement radiograph.
    McBride TJ; Prakash D
    Postgrad Med J; 2011 Feb; 87(1024):101-9. PubMed ID: 21059601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Total hip arthroplasty with use of second-generation cementing techniques. An eighteen-year-average follow-up study.
    Smith SW; Estok DM; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Nov; 80(11):1632-40. PubMed ID: 9840632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter- and intraobserver study of radiographic assessment of cemented total hip arthroplasties.
    Kramhøft M; Gehrchen PM; Bødtker S; Wagner A; Jensen F
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Apr; 11(3):272-6. PubMed ID: 8713905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiographic grading of femoral stem cementation in hip arthroplasty.
    Garcia FL; Sugo AT; Picado CH
    Acta Ortop Bras; 2013 Jan; 21(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 24453640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The accuracy and reproducibility of radiographic assessment of stress-shielding. A postmortem analysis.
    Engh CA; McAuley JP; Sychterz CJ; Sacco ME; Engh CA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Oct; 82(10):1414-20. PubMed ID: 11057469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical and radiological evaluation of revision hip arthroplasty using the cement-in-cement technique.
    Goto K; Kawanabe K; Akiyama H; Morimoto T; Nakamura T
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Aug; 90(8):1013-8. PubMed ID: 18669955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification system of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty.
    Naqvi GA; Baig SA; Awan N
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1047-50. PubMed ID: 22425302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up.
    Callaghan JJ; Albright JC; Goetz DD; Olejniczak JP; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Apr; 82(4):487-97. PubMed ID: 10761939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of different cement insertion techniques on the bone-cement interface.
    Horne JG; Bruce W; Devane PA; Teoh HH
    J Arthroplasty; 2002 Aug; 17(5):579-83. PubMed ID: 12168173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review.
    Duncan WW; Hubble MJ; Howell JR; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 May; 91(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 19407288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advantage of the transprosthetic drainage system (TDS) for application in cemented hip arthroplasty--a standardized experimental comparison with other cementing techniques.
    Schmidt J; Specht R; Steur G
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1996; 115(3-4):153-7. PubMed ID: 8861581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.