138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8873029)
1. Image compression in digital mammography: effects on computerized detection of subtle microcalcifications.
Chan HP; Lo SC; Niklason LT; Ikeda DM; Lam KL
Med Phys; 1996 Aug; 23(8):1325-36. PubMed ID: 8873029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications.
Chan HP; Niklason LT; Ikeda DM; Lam KL; Adler DD
Med Phys; 1994 Jul; 21(7):1203-11. PubMed ID: 7968855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography.
Penedo M; Pearlman WA; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Vidal JJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Oct; 22(10):1288-96. PubMed ID: 14552582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detecting clustered microcalcifications in the female breast: secondary digitized images versus mammograms.
De Maeseneer M; Beeckman P; Osteaux M; Mattheus R; Hoste M; Bastaerts Y; Jong B
J Belge Radiol; 1992 Jun; 75(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 1400145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.
Chan HP; Vyborny CJ; MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Sickles EA
Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 3623862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network.
Chan HP; Lo SC; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 1995 Oct; 22(10):1555-67. PubMed ID: 8551980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided detection of microcalcifications in mammograms. Methodology and preliminary clinical study.
Chan HP; Doi K; Vyborny CJ; Lam KL; Schmidt RA
Invest Radiol; 1988 Sep; 23(9):664-71. PubMed ID: 3182213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.
Carton AK; Bosmans H; Vandenbroucke D; Souverijns G; Van Ongeval C; Dragusin O; Marchal G
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2165-76. PubMed ID: 15305471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of simulated lesions on data-compressed digital mammograms.
Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Vedantham S; Waldrop SM; D'Orsi CJ
Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15983071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of JPEG2000 data compression on an automated system for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Penedo M; Lado MJ; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Vidal JJ
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2006 Apr; 10(2):354-61. PubMed ID: 16617624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative comparison of clustered microcalcifications in for-presentation and for-processing mammograms in full-field digital mammography.
Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3726-3738. PubMed ID: 28477395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation of psychophysical similarity measures for selection of similar images in the diagnosis of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms.
Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt R; Shiraishi J; Doi K
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5695-702. PubMed ID: 19175126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital mammography: observer performance study of the effects of pixel size on the characterization of malignant and benign microcalcifications.
Chan HP; Helvie MA; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Adler DD; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Blane CE; Joynt LK; Wilson TE; Hadjiiski LM; Goodsitt MM
Acad Radiol; 2001 Jun; 8(6):454-66. PubMed ID: 11394537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications: evaluation of performance on mammograms from multiple centers.
Nishikawa RM; Doi K; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Vyborny CJ; Monnier-Cholley L; Papaioannou J; Lu P
Radiographics; 1995 Mar; 15(2):443-52. PubMed ID: 7761647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A wavelet-based algorithm for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Lado MJ; Tahoces PG; Méndez AJ; Souto M; Vidal JJ
Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1294-305. PubMed ID: 10435531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrated wavelets for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
Heinlein P; Drexl J; Schneider W
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Mar; 22(3):402-13. PubMed ID: 12760557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A quantitative method for evaluating the detectability of lesions in digital mammography.
Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):214-8. PubMed ID: 18319282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: applications of artificial neural networks.
Wu Y; Doi K; Giger ML; Nishikawa RM
Med Phys; 1992; 19(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 1508089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
