138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8873029)
21. Reproducibility of computer-aided detection marks in digital mammography.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 17554186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A fractal approach to the segmentation of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Lefebvre F; Benali H; Gilles R; Kahn E; Di Paola R
Med Phys; 1995 Apr; 22(4):381-90. PubMed ID: 7609718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. LCD versus CRT monitors for digital mammography: a comparison of observer performance for the detection of clustered microcalcifications and masses.
Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Lee EH; Park JS; Jang MJ
Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1104-8. PubMed ID: 19922305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Detection of subtle microcalcifications: comparison of computed radiography and screen-film mammography.
Higashida Y; Moribe N; Morita K; Katsuda N; Hatemura M; Takada T; Takahashi M; Yamashita J
Radiology; 1992 May; 183(2):483-6. PubMed ID: 1561354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. High-performance wavelet compression for mammography: localization response operating characteristic evaluation.
Kallergi M; Lucier BJ; Berman CG; Hersh MR; Kim JJ; Szabunio MS; Clark RA
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 16373759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications: an improved method for grouping detected signals.
Nishikawa RM; Giger ML; Doi K; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA
Med Phys; 1993; 20(6):1661-6. PubMed ID: 8309438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification.
Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Wolverton DE; Metz CE; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Vyborny CJ; Doi K
Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 8628853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Detection of simulated microcalcifications in fixed mammary tissue: An ROC study of the effect of local versus global histogram equalization.
Sund T; Olsen JB
Acta Radiol; 2006 Sep; 47(7):650-4. PubMed ID: 16950699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications on digital mammograms.
Nishikawa RM; Giger ML; Doi K; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA
Med Biol Eng Comput; 1995 Mar; 33(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 7643656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The use of an interactive software program for quantitative characterization of microcalcifications on digitized film-screen mammograms.
Leichter I; Lederman R; Bamberger P; Novak B; Fields S; Buchbinder SS
Invest Radiol; 1999 Jun; 34(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 10353031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Real and simulated clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. ROC study of observer performance.
Lado MJ; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Méndez AJ; Vidal JJ
Med Phys; 1997 Sep; 24(9):1385-94. PubMed ID: 9304566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms.
Penedo M; Souto M; Tahoces PG; Carreira JM; Villalón J; Porto G; Seoane C; Vidal JJ; Berbaum KS; Chakraborty DP; Fajardo LL
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):450-7. PubMed ID: 16244253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Optimal filter-based detection of microcalcifications.
Gulsrud TO; Husøy JH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Nov; 48(11):1272-81. PubMed ID: 11686626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications.
El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Wernick MN; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Dec; 21(12):1552-63. PubMed ID: 12588039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An improved computer-assisted diagnostic scheme using wavelet transform for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Yoshida H; Doi K; Nishikawa RM; Giger ML; Schmidt RA
Acad Radiol; 1996 Aug; 3(8):621-7. PubMed ID: 8796725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Computer-aided diagnosis in the detection of simulated clustered microcalcifications on mammography].
Horino K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Jun; 58(7):343-8. PubMed ID: 9711073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Analysis of methods for reducing false positives in the automated detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.
Nagel RH; Nishikawa RM; Papaioannou J; Doi K
Med Phys; 1998 Aug; 25(8):1502-6. PubMed ID: 9725141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Zooming method (x 2.0) of digital mammography vs digital magnification view (x 1.8) in full-field digital mammography for the diagnosis of microcalcifications.
Kim MJ; Youk JH; Kang DR; Choi SH; Kwak JY; Son EJ; Kim EK
Br J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 83(990):486-92. PubMed ID: 19752171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Film-screen magnification versus electronic magnification and enhancement of digitized contact mammograms in the assessment of subtle microcalcifications.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Kontogiannis E; Gourtsoyiannis N
Invest Radiol; 2001 Dec; 36(12):726-33. PubMed ID: 11753144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
