These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8873032)

  • 1. Basic imaging properties of a new screen-film system for chest radiography.
    Higashida Y; Murakami Y; Yoshida A; Kastuda N; Moribe N; Bussaka H; Hamada T; Yoshida Y; Hidetoshi M; Takahashi M
    Med Phys; 1996 Aug; 23(8):1351-7. PubMed ID: 8873032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography.
    Morishita J; MacMahon H; Doi K; Carlin M; Sukenobu Y
    Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1769-75. PubMed ID: 7891639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Preliminary clinical applications of asymmetric screen-film systems in chest radiography].
    Higashida Y; Katsuda N; Tochihara S; Yoshioka S; Bussaka H; Tomiguchi S; Takada T; Matsumoto M; Takahashi M; Yoshida A
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Feb; 54(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 8121782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-speed, single-screen/single-emulsion film systems: basic imaging properties and preliminary clinical applications.
    Higashida Y; Frank PH; Doi K
    Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):571-7. PubMed ID: 6622705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems.
    Sanada S; Doi K; Xu XW; Yin FF; Giger ML; MacMahon H
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 1870484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of crossover exposure on radiographic image quality of screen-film systems.
    Doi K; Loo LN; Anderson TM; Frank PH
    Radiology; 1981 Jun; 139(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 7232738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new asymmetric screen-film combination for conventional chest radiography: evaluation in 50 patients.
    Swensen SJ; Gray JE; Brown LR; Aughenbaugh GL; Harms GF; Stears J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):483-6. PubMed ID: 8430540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimum tube voltage for chest radiographs obtained by psychophysical analysis.
    Asai Y; Tanabe Y; Ozaki Y; Kubota H; Matsumoto M; Kanamori H
    Med Phys; 1998 Nov; 25(11):2170-5. PubMed ID: 9829241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Schemes for the optimization of chest radiography using a computer model of the patient and x-ray imaging system.
    Sandborg M; McVey G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 11695764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
    Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
    Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of various X-ray film/screen systems in demonstrating small simulated low-density lung nodules.
    Maruyama Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):509-15. PubMed ID: 9778937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective performance characteristics of a new asymmetric screen-film system.
    Van Metter R; Dickerson R
    Med Phys; 1994 Sep; 21(9):1483-90. PubMed ID: 7838060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based imaging system for thoracic radiography.
    Aufrichtig R
    Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1349-58. PubMed ID: 10435537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging.
    McLean D; Gray JE; Swensen SJ; Vrieze TJ
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 9587769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dual-film cassette technique for studying the effect of radiographic image quality on diagnostic accuracy.
    Higashida Y; Doi K; Lehr JL; MacMahon H
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(5):646-52. PubMed ID: 6503880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.