166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8873241)
1. Flavor-postingestive consequence associations incorporate the behaviorally opposing effects of positive reinforcement and anticipated satiety: implications for interpreting two-bottle tests.
Warwick ZS; Weingarten HP
Physiol Behav; 1996 Sep; 60(3):711-5. PubMed ID: 8873241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learned suppression of intake based on anticipated calories: cross-nutrient comparisons.
Warwick ZS; Bowen KJ; Synowski SJ
Physiol Behav; 1997 Dec; 62(6):1319-24. PubMed ID: 9383120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flavor-cued modulation of intake in rats: role of familiarity and impact on 24-h intake.
Warwick ZS; Synowski SJ; Coons V; Hendrickson A
Physiol Behav; 1999 Oct; 67(4):527-32. PubMed ID: 10549889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learned preferences for real-fed and sham-fed polycose in rats: interaction of taste, postingestive reinforcement, and satiety.
Sclafani A; Nissenbaum JW; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 1994 Aug; 56(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 7938246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flavor preferences conditioned by sucrose depend upon training and testing methods: two-bottle tests revisited.
Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2002 Aug; 76(4-5):633-44. PubMed ID: 12127003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modern 'junk food' and minimally-processed 'natural food' cafeteria diets alter the response to sweet taste but do not impair flavor-nutrient learning in rats.
Palframan KM; Myers KP
Physiol Behav; 2016 Apr; 157():146-57. PubMed ID: 26796789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flavor preferences conditioned by postingestive effects of nutrients in preweanling rats.
Myers KP; Ferris J; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2005 Mar; 84(3):407-19. PubMed ID: 15763578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric polycose in rats: more concentrated polycose is not always more reinforcing.
Lucas F; Azzara AV; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 1997 Dec; 63(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 9402608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sucrose taste but not Polycose taste conditions flavor preferences in rats.
Bonacchi KB; Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2008 Sep; 95(1-2):235-44. PubMed ID: 18602411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pharmacology of flavor preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: effects of naltrexone.
Yu WZ; Sclafani A; Delamater AR; Bodnar RJ
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 Nov; 64(3):573-84. PubMed ID: 10548274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Glucose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats: taste versus postingestive conditioning.
Sclafani A; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 1994 Aug; 56(2):399-405. PubMed ID: 7938256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in male and female rats: effects of sweet taste and sugar concentration.
Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Appetite; 2004 Jun; 42(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 15183920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Energy density and macronutrient composition determine flavor preference conditioned by intragastric infusions of mixed diets.
Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2006 Sep; 89(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 16854441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flavor preferences conditioned by postingestive effect of sucrose and porcine digestive peptides in postweaning pigs.
Figueroa J; Solà-Oriol D; Guzmán-Pino S; Borda E; Pérez JF
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90 Suppl 4():381-3. PubMed ID: 23365386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rats acquire stronger preference for flavors consumed towards the end of a high-fat meal.
Myers KP
Physiol Behav; 2013 Feb; 110-111():179-89. PubMed ID: 23313407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric sugar infusions in rats: maltose is more reinforcing than sucrose.
Azzara AV; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 1998 Jun; 64(4):535-41. PubMed ID: 9761229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flavor preference conditioning as a function of fat source.
Ackroff K; Lucas F; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2005 Jul; 85(4):448-60. PubMed ID: 15990126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Capsaicin attenuates feeding suppression but not reinforcement by intestinal nutrients.
Lucas F; Sclafani A
Am J Physiol; 1996 May; 270(5 Pt 2):R1059-64. PubMed ID: 8928906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethanol-conditioned flavor preferences compared with sugar- and fat-conditioned preferences in rats.
Ackroff K; Rozental D; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2004 Jun; 81(4):699-713. PubMed ID: 15178165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conditioned flavor avoidance, preference, and indifference produced by intragastric infusions of galactose, glucose, and fructose in rats.
Sclafani A; Fanizza LJ; Azzara AV
Physiol Behav; 1999 Aug; 67(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 10477054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
