These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8873635)

  • 21. Connections between open access publishing and access to gray literature.
    Banks M
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2004 Apr; 92(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 15088074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What weight does impact factor carry?
    Aase S
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Oct; 108(10):1604-7. PubMed ID: 18926118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three cheers for peers.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scientific publishing. Peer review and quality: a dubious connection?
    Enserink M
    Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2187-8. PubMed ID: 11567115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The dangers of advocacy in science.
    Gitzen RA
    Science; 2007 Aug; 317(5839):748. PubMed ID: 17690275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The politics of publication.
    Lawrence PA
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. CONSORT and beyond.
    Blackstone EH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 16872939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Responsibility in advertising.
    Mann E
    CMAJ; 2003 Mar; 168(6):673; discussion 673, 675. PubMed ID: 12642416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
    Oren GA
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Journals: impact factors are too highly valued.
    Davies J
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):210. PubMed ID: 12529611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen.
    Michell B
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A case for instant peer review?
    Henneberg M
    Nature; 1996 Dec; 384(6608):401. PubMed ID: 8945454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Apparent non-cited overlap between two published articles by the same group of authors.
    Cardiology; 2010; 117(3):197. PubMed ID: 21252533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Editorial: an age of enlightenment or information overload?
    Davis TR
    J Hand Surg Br; 2004 Dec; 29(6):521-9. PubMed ID: 15542210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The real dirty secret of academic publishing.
    Svetlov V
    Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):897. PubMed ID: 15496892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Making sure corrections don't vanish online.
    Shim EH; Parekh V
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):18; discussion 18. PubMed ID: 15744271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Journals should set a new standard in transparency.
    Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Regional associations of medical journal editors: moving from rhetoric to reality.
    Habibzadeh F
    Bull World Health Organ; 2005 Jun; 83(6):404. PubMed ID: 15976887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Financial interests are not the only bias factor.
    Gori GB
    Nature; 2001 Oct; 413(6856):565. PubMed ID: 11595913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
    Adam D; Knight J
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.