231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8873676)
1. Reduced arrhythmogenicity of biphasic versus monophasic T-wave shocks. Implications for defibrillation efficacy.
Behrens S; Li C; Kirchhof P; Fabritz FL; Franz MR
Circulation; 1996 Oct; 94(8):1974-80. PubMed ID: 8873676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Myocardial vulnerability to T wave shocks: relation to shock strength, shock coupling interval, and dispersion of ventricular repolarization.
Fabritz CL; Kirchhof PF; Behrens S; Zabel M; Franz MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Mar; 7(3):231-42. PubMed ID: 8867297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lidocaine increases the proarrhythmic effects of monophasic but not biphasic shocks.
Sims JJ; Miller AW; Ujhelyi MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 Dec; 12(12):1363-8. PubMed ID: 11797993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Timing of the upper limit of vulnerability is different for monophasic and biphasic shocks: implications for the determination of the defibrillation threshold.
Behrens S; Li C; Franz MR
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2179-87. PubMed ID: 9309741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shock-induced dispersion of ventricular repolarization: implications for the induction of ventricular fibrillation and the upper limit of vulnerability.
Behrens S; Li C; Fabritz CL; Kirchhof PF; Franz MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 8(9):998-1008. PubMed ID: 9300297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transthoracic biphasic waveform defibrillation at very high and very low energies: a comparison with monophasic waveforms in an animal model of ventricular fibrillation.
Clark CB; Zhang Y; Davies LR; Karlsson G; Kerber RE
Resuscitation; 2002 Aug; 54(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 12161298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. External exponential biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform: efficacy in ventricular fibrillation of longer duration.
Yamanouchi Y; Brewer JE; Donohoo AM; Mowrey KA; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Oct; 22(10):1481-7. PubMed ID: 10588150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of biphasic and conventional monophasic defibrillation on postresuscitation myocardial function.
Tang W; Weil MH; Sun S; Yamaguchi H; Povoas HP; Pernat AM; Bisera J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 34(3):815-22. PubMed ID: 10483965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of monophasic and biphasic shocks on action potentials during ventricular fibrillation in dogs.
Zhou X; Wolf PD; Rollins DL; Afework Y; Smith WM; Ideker RE
Circ Res; 1993 Aug; 73(2):325-34. PubMed ID: 8330375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pediatric transthoracic defibrillation: biphasic versus monophasic waveforms in an experimental model.
Clark CB; Zhang Y; Davies LR; Karlsson G; Kerber RE
Resuscitation; 2001 Nov; 51(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 11718971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of biphasic and monophasic waveform defibrillation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation.
Tang W; Weil MH; Sun S; Povoas HP; Klouche K; Kamohara T; Bisera J
Chest; 2001 Sep; 120(3):948-54. PubMed ID: 11555534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Induction of ventricular fibrillation by T-wave field-shocks in the isolated perfused rabbit heart: role of nonuniform shock responses.
Kirchhof PF; Fabritz CL; Behrens S; Franz MR
Basic Res Cardiol; 1997 Feb; 92(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 9062650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biphasic and monophasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation: a meta analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Faddy SC; Powell J; Craig JC
Resuscitation; 2003 Jul; 58(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12867304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-tilt monophasic and biphasic waveforms compared with standard biphasic waveforms in the transvenous defibrillation of ventricular fibrillation.
Bennett JR; Darragh KM; Walsh SJ; Allen DJ; Scott M; Stevenson M; Adgey JA; Anderson JM; Manoharan G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Mar; 37(3):279-89. PubMed ID: 24102186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transthoracic monophasic and biphasic defibrillation in a swine model: a comparison of efficacy, ST segment changes, and postshock hemodynamics.
Niemann JT; Burian D; Garner D; Lewis RJ
Resuscitation; 2000 Sep; 47(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 11004381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of ventricular fibrillation duration and a preceding unsuccessful shock on the probability of defibrillation success using biphasic waveforms in pigs.
Windecker S; Kay GN; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Smith WM; Ideker RE
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Dec; 8(12):1386-95. PubMed ID: 9436776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic countershock after prolonged ventricular fibrillation in a swine model.
Niemann JT; Burian D; Garner D; Lewis RJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Sep; 36(3):932-8. PubMed ID: 10987622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for external defibrillation. Physio-Control Biphasic Investigators.
Higgins SL; Herre JM; Epstein AE; Greer GS; Friedman PL; Gleva ML; Porterfield JG; Chapman FW; Finkel ES; Schmitt PW; Nova RC; Greene HL
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2000; 4(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 11045408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biphasic and monophasic transthoracic defibrillation in pigs with acute left ventricular dysfunction.
Zhang Y; Karlsson G; Davies LR; Coddington WJ; Kerber RE
Resuscitation; 2001 Jul; 50(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 11719135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biphasic versus monophasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Faddy SC; Jennings PA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 2(2):CD006762. PubMed ID: 26904970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
