These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8873787)

  • 1. Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition short forms with underachieving and learning disabled students.
    Lawson TT; Evans LD
    Psychol Rep; 1996 Aug; 79(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 8873787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing scores on the Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition with the WISC-R for exceptional children.
    Hollinger CL; Baldwin C
    Psychol Rep; 1990 Jun; 66(3 Pt 1):979-84. PubMed ID: 1696017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition and the WISC--R for children in the lower range of intelligence.
    Lukens J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):819-22. PubMed ID: 2377415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationships between scores on Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence--Revised and Stanford-Binet IV.
    Carvajal HH; Parks JP; Bays KJ; Logan RA; Lujano CI; Page GL; Weaver KA
    Psychol Rep; 1991 Aug; 69(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 1961799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition: a small study of concurrent validity.
    Hollinger CL; Baldwin C
    Psychol Rep; 1990 Jun; 66(3 Pt 2):1331-6. PubMed ID: 2385722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A validity study of the Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition with students with learning disabilities.
    Smith DK; St Martin ME; Lyon MA
    J Learn Disabil; 1989 Apr; 22(4):260-1. PubMed ID: 2738463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of three-year-olds with the Stanford-Binet Fourth Edition.
    Johnson DL; Howie VM; Owen M; Baldwin CD; Luttman D
    Psychol Rep; 1993 Aug; 73(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 8367579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unreliable block span reveals simulated intellectual disability on the stanford-binet intelligence scales-fifth edition.
    Barker A; Musso MW; Jones GN; Roid G; Gouvier D
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2014; 21(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 24826496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of cognitive deficiency with the McCarthy Scales and Stanford-Binet: a correlational analysis.
    Levenson RL; Zino TC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Feb; 48(1):291-5. PubMed ID: 450631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Kaufman's short form of the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales--Fourth Edition.
    Karr SK; Carvajal H; Palmer BL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1120-2. PubMed ID: 1501979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Percent of agreement among raters and rater reliability of the copying subtest of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition.
    Mason EM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Apr; 74(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 1594393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. External validity of the profile variability index for the K-ABC, Stanford-Binet, and WISC-R: another cul de-sac.
    Kline RB; Snyder J; Guilmette S; Castellanos M
    J Learn Disabil; 1993 Oct; 26(8):557-67. PubMed ID: 8245701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlations between scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III and the General Purpose Abbreviated Battery of the Stanford-Binet IV.
    Carvajal HH; Hayes JE; Lackey KL; Rathke ML; Wiebe DA; Weaver KA
    Psychol Rep; 1993 Jun; 72(3 Pt 2):1167-70. PubMed ID: 8337322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of preschoolers at-risk with the WPPSI--R and the Stanford-Binet L-M.
    Gerken KC; Hodapp AF
    Psychol Rep; 1992 Oct; 71(2):659-64. PubMed ID: 1410125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the Stanford-Binet abbreviated and complete forms for developmentally disabled children.
    Bloom AS; Klee SH; Raskin LM
    J Clin Psychol; 1977 Apr; 33(2):477-82. PubMed ID: 870534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability, criterion-related validity and qualitative comments of the Fourth Edition of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale with a young adult population with intellectual disability.
    Dacey CM; Nelson WM; Stoeckel J
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 1999 Jun; 43 ( Pt 3)():179-84. PubMed ID: 10392604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition and form L-M in assessment of young children with mental retardation.
    Wilson WM
    Ment Retard; 1992 Apr; 30(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 1584032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extrapolated Stanford-Binet IQs for mentally retarded and mentally gifted individuals.
    Silverstein AB
    Psychol Rep; 1980 Jun; 46(3 Pt 1):900-2. PubMed ID: 7394105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of an item-reduction short form of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition with college students.
    Nagle RJ; Bell NL
    J Clin Psychol; 1995 Jan; 51(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 7782477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The utility of short forms of the Stanford-Binet tests of intelligence with mentally retarded children.
    BIRCH JW
    Am J Ment Defic; 1954 Jan; 59(3):462-84. PubMed ID: 13218066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.