These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8873858)

  • 1. Sonographic evaluation of the wall thickness of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean section.
    Tanik A; Ustun C; Cil E; Arslan A
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1996 Sep; 24(7):355-7. PubMed ID: 8873858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Transvaginal ultrasonic evaluation of the thickness of the section of the uterine wall in previous cesarean sections].
    Montanari L; Alfei A; Drovanti A; Lepadatu C; Lorenzi D; Facchini D; Iervasi MT; Sampaolo P
    Minerva Ginecol; 1999 Apr; 51(4):107-12. PubMed ID: 10379144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with a single previous Cesarean section.
    Sanlorenzo O; Farina A; Pula G; Zanello M; Pedrazzi A; Martina T; Gabrielli S; Simonazzi G; Rizzo N
    Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Oct; 65(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 24096291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Kushtagi P; Garepalli S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Mar; 283(3):455-9. PubMed ID: 20145938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous caesarean section.
    Cheung VY
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2005 Jul; 27(7):674-81. PubMed ID: 16100622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Second-trimester sonographic comparison of the lower uterine segment in pregnant women with and without a previous cesarean delivery.
    Sambaziotis H; Conway C; Figueroa R; Elimian A; Garry D
    J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Jul; 23(7):907-11; quiz 913-4. PubMed ID: 15292558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients of previous cesarean section.
    Sen S; Malik S; Salhan S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2004 Dec; 87(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15548392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness at term in women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Uharček P; Brešťanský A; Ravinger J; Máňová A; Zajacová M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Sep; 292(3):609-12. PubMed ID: 25814295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variables influencing the integrity of lower uterine segment in post-cesarean pregnancy.
    Brahmalakshmy BL; Kushtagi P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Apr; 291(4):755-62. PubMed ID: 25209351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Correlation between uterine scar condition and uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section].
    Wang LL; Chen JY; Yang HX; Fan LX; Zhang XX; Jing BH; Huang RN; Li C
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):375-380. PubMed ID: 31262121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness after prior cesarean section to predict uterine rupture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Swift BE; Shah PS; Farine D
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jul; 98(7):830-841. PubMed ID: 30779345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy.
    Vachon-Marceau C; Demers S; Bujold E; Roberge S; Gauthier RJ; Pasquier JC; Girard M; Chaillet N; Boulvain M; Jastrow N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):65.e1-65.e5. PubMed ID: 28263751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lower uterine segment thickness measurement in pregnant women with previous Cesarean section: reliability analysis using two- and three-dimensional transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound.
    Martins WP; Barra DA; Gallarreta FM; Nastri CO; Filho FM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 19148891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasound Predictability of Lower Uterine Segment Cesarean Section Scar Thickness.
    Tazion S; Hafeez M; Manzoor R; Rana T
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2018 May; 28(5):361-364. PubMed ID: 29690964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurements of the lower uterine segment during gestation.
    Ginsberg Y; Goldstein I; Lowenstein L; Weiner Z
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 May; 41(4):214-7. PubMed ID: 23505018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the lower uterine segment in pregnant women with and without previous cesarean section in 3 T MRI.
    Hoffmann J; Exner M; Bremicker K; Grothoff M; Stumpp P; Stepan H
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 May; 19(1):160. PubMed ID: 31068180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean delivery.
    Cheung VY; Constantinescu OC; Ahluwalia BS
    J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Nov; 23(11):1441-7. PubMed ID: 15498908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis.
    Kok N; Wiersma IC; Opmeer BC; de Graaf IM; Mol BW; Pajkrt E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 42(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 23576473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Echographic measurement of the inferior uterine segment for assessing the risk of uterine rupture].
    Rozenberg P; Goffinet F; Philippe HJ; Nisand I
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 9417464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting incomplete uterine rupture with vaginal sonography during the late second trimester in women with prior cesarean.
    Gotoh H; Masuzaki H; Yoshida A; Yoshimura S; Miyamura T; Ishimaru T
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Apr; 95(4):596-600. PubMed ID: 10725496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.