These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8876004)

  • 41. Comparison of prosthetic outcomes between adolescent transtibial and transfemoral amputees after Sichuan earthquake using Step Activity Monitor and Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire.
    Chu CK; Wong MS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 25428900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system.
    Gholizadeh H; Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Abas WA; Azam MN
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21794965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of speed on gait parameters and on symmetry in trans-tibial amputees.
    Isakov E; Burger H; Krajnik J; Gregoric M; Marincek C
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1996 Dec; 20(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 8985994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A comparative study of the physiological costs of walking in ten bilateral amputees.
    Wright DA; Marks L; Payne RC
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Mar; 32(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 18330804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Energy expenditure of trans-tibial amputees during ambulation at self-selected pace.
    Gailey RS; Wenger MA; Raya M; Kirk N; Erbs K; Spyropoulos P; Nash MS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1994 Aug; 18(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 7991365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A pilot study to test the influence of specific prosthetic features in preventing trans-tibial amputees from walking like able-bodied subjects.
    Stefanyshyn DJ; Engsberg JR; Tedford KG; Harder JA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1994 Dec; 18(3):180-90. PubMed ID: 7724351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Conventional versus microchip controlled pneumatic swing phase control for trans-femoral amputees: user's verdict.
    Datta D; Howitt J
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1998 Aug; 22(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 9747997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effects of fluid insert volume changes on socket pressures and shear stresses: case studies from two trans-tibial amputee subjects.
    Sanders JE; Jacobsen AK; Fergason JR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Dec; 30(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 17162516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A comparative evaluation of oxygen consumption and gait pattern in amputees using Intelligent Prostheses and conventionally damped knee swing-phase control.
    Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J
    Clin Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 19(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 15929508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Functional status and prosthesis use in amputees, measured with the Prosthetic Profile of the Amputee (PPA) and the short version of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP68).
    Streppel KR; de Vries J; van Harten WH
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2001 Sep; 24(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11560243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency--acquired and congenital.
    Datta D; Selvarajah K; Davey N
    Clin Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 18(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15053126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of gait using a Multiflex foot versus a Quantum foot in knee disarticulation amputees.
    Boonstra AM; Fidler V; Spits GM; Tuil P; Hof AL
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Aug; 17(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 8233774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The energy cost for the step-to-step transition in amputee walking.
    Houdijk H; Pollmann E; Groenewold M; Wiggerts H; Polomski W
    Gait Posture; 2009 Jul; 30(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 19321343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A new modular six-bar linkage trans-femoral prosthesis for walking and squatting.
    Chakraborty JK; Patil KM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1994 Aug; 18(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 7991367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A picture of amputees and the prosthetic situation in Haiti.
    Bigelow J; Korth M; Jacobs J; Anger N; Riddle M; Gifford J
    Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Feb; 26(4):246-52. PubMed ID: 15164958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparison of energy expenditure by a high level trans-femoral amputee using the Intelligent Prosthesis and conventionally damped prosthetic limbs.
    Taylor MB; Clark E; Offord EA; Baxter C
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1996 Aug; 20(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 8876005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Rehabilitation of the elderly amputee.
    Lavan J
    Ir Med J; 1991 Oct; 84(3):91-3. PubMed ID: 1791125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Survey of upper limb prosthesis users in Sweden, the United Kingdom and Canada.
    Kyberd PJ; Hill W
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21697204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A new alignment jig for quantification and prescription of three-dimensional alignment for the patellar-tendon-bearing trans-tibial prosthesis.
    Sin SW; Chow DH; Cheng JC
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Dec; 23(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10890597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee.
    Hafner BJ; Willingham LL; Buell NC; Allyn KJ; Smith DG
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 17270519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.