These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8876494)

  • 41. Transverse features of subjects with sucking habits and facial hyperdivergency in the mixed dentition.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Mucedero M; Polimeni A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):226-9. PubMed ID: 17693374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Predictors of long-term stability of maxillary dental arch dimensions in patients treated with a transpalatal arch followed by fixed appliances.
    Raucci G; Elyasi M; PachĂȘco-Pereira C; Grassia V; d'Apuzzo F; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():24. PubMed ID: 26215180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dental arch dimensions and tooth wear in two samples of children in the 1950s and 1990s.
    Camporesi M; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Defraia E
    Br Dent J; 2009 Dec; 207(12):E24. PubMed ID: 19876044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Barbosa LAG; Araujo E; Behrents RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):914-920. PubMed ID: 28457269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessment of skeletal and dental pattern of Class II division 1 malocclusion with relevance to clinical practice.
    Sidlauskas A; Svalkauskiene V; Sidlauskas M
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 16687908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Second molar extraction technique: overrated or underutilized?
    Rondeau BH
    Funct Orthod; 1999; 16(4):4-14. PubMed ID: 11314333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparision of dental arch widths in different types of malocclusions.
    Basaran G; Hamamci N; Hamamci O
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):e20-8. PubMed ID: 19641761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A long-term evaluation of the mandibular Schwarz appliance and the acrylic splint expander in early mixed dentition patients.
    O'Grady PW; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):202-13. PubMed ID: 16905065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Differences in dental arch morphology among adult females with untreated Class I and Class II malocclusion.
    Buschang PH; Stroud J; Alexander RG
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Feb; 16(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 8181550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The mandibular response in Class II malocclusions correction.
    Cordua T; Deli R; Giuliante L; Ursini R
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):31-9. PubMed ID: 22031992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of the mandibular dental and basal arch forms in adults and children with Class I and Class II malocclusions.
    Gupta D; Miner RM; Arai K; Will LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):10.e1-8; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 20620824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample.
    Al-Khateeb SN; Abu Alhaija ES
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 16637727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Nonextraction treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusions.
    Arvystas MG
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Nov; 88(5):380-95. PubMed ID: 3864372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Karacay S; Akin E; Olmez H; Gurton AU; Sagdic D
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 16808575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Surgical Orthodontic Treatment Involving Mandibular Premolar Extraction in Patient with Mandibular Retrusion Associated with Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis.
    Nojima K; Nagata M; Ootake T; Nishii Y; Yakushiji T; Narita M; Takano N; Sueishi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2019 Jun; 60(2):139-149. PubMed ID: 30971679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition.
    Croft RS; Buschang PH; English JD; Meyer R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 10511673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A comparison of dental arch forms between Class II Division 1 and normal occlusion assessed by euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Nie Q; Lin J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):528-35. PubMed ID: 16627179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Relationship between maxillary and mandibular base lengths and dental crowding in patients with complete Class II malocclusions.
    Janson G; Goizueta OE; Garib DG; Janson M
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Mar; 81(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 21208072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.