These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8877495)

  • 1. Analysis of three-dimensional computerized representations of articular cartilage lesions.
    Lavid NE; DePaolis DC; Pope TW; Hinson GW; Munns SW; Batnitzky S; Wetzel LH; Wilkinson SB; Gordon MA
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Sep; 31(9):577-85. PubMed ID: 8877495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional computerized reconstruction. Illustration of incremental articular cartilage thinning.
    Tebben PJ; Pope TW; Hinson G; Batnitzky S; Wetzel LH; DePaolis DC; Munns S; Wilkinson SB; Gordon MA
    Invest Radiol; 1997 Aug; 32(8):475-84. PubMed ID: 9258736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fat suppression gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: comparison between phase-contrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T.
    Palosaari K; Ojala R; Blanco-Sequeiros R; Tervonen O
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Aug; 18(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 12884336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of IDEAL 2D FSE and 3D SPGR with fat-saturated 2D FSE and 3D SPGR in a porcine model.
    Cha JG; Yoo JH; Rhee SJ; Hwang SS; Han JK
    Acta Radiol; 2014 May; 55(4):462-9. PubMed ID: 23943628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective comparison of 3D FIESTA versus fat-suppressed 3D SPGR MRI in evaluating knee cartilage lesions.
    Li X; Yu C; Wu H; Daniel K; Hu D; Xia L; Pan C; Xu A; Hu J; Wang L; Peng W; Li F
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 19748006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MRI findings in injured articular cartilage of the knee correlated with surgical findings.
    Li XM; Peng WJ; Wu H; Kacher D; Xia LM; Ai F; Li F; Xiong W
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(21):2624-30. PubMed ID: 19951582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MR imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: evaluation of two- and three-dimensional sequences.
    Tervonen O; Dietz MJ; Carmichael SW; Ehman RL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 3(4):663-8. PubMed ID: 8347961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3T system scientific research.
    Milewski MD; Smitaman E; Moukaddam H; Katz LD; Essig DA; Medvecky MJ; Haims AH
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 21683539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. IDEAL 3D spoiled gradient echo of the articular cartilage of the knee on 3.0 T MRI: a comparison with conventional 3.0 T fast spin-echo T2 fat saturation image.
    Han CH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Chung EC; Choi SH; Yun JS; Rho MH
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1479-86. PubMed ID: 25348476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [MRT of the knee joint cartilage using 3D volume imaging in combination with a fast image processor].
    Adam G; Bondorf K; Prescher A; Drobnitzky M; Günther RW
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1989; 30(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 2587726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with three-dimensional MR imaging.
    Dupuy DE; Spillane RM; Rosol MS; Rosenthal DI; Palmer WE; Burke DW; Rosenberg AE
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Nov; 3(11):919-24. PubMed ID: 8959181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.
    Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences.
    Kornaat PR; Reeder SB; Koo S; Brittain JH; Yu H; Andriacchi TP; Gold GE
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2005 Apr; 13(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 15780647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of localized cartilage volume and thickness of human knee joints by computer analysis of three-dimensional magnetic resonance images.
    Kshirsagar AA; Watson PJ; Tyler JA; Hall LD
    Invest Radiol; 1998 May; 33(5):289-99. PubMed ID: 9609488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
    Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation.
    Peterfy CG; van Dijke CF; Janzen DL; Glüer CC; Namba R; Majumdar S; Lang P; Genant HK
    Radiology; 1994 Aug; 192(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 8029420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
    Lee SY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Koh IJ; Kim JM
    Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Isotropic 3-dimensional fast spin echo imaging versus standard 2-dimensional imaging at 3.0 T of the knee: artificial cartilage and meniscal lesions in a porcine model.
    Ristow O; Stehling C; Krug R; Steinbach L; Sabo G; Ambekar A; Huber M; Link TM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 20351518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.