165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8879928)
1. Quantitative aspects of isoeugenol contact allergy assessed by use and patch tests.
Johansen JD; Andersen KE; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Jun; 34(6):414-8. PubMed ID: 8879928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The time-dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals.
Andersen KE; Johansen JD; Bruze M; Frosch PJ; Goossens A; Lepoittevin JP; Rastogi S; White I; Menné T
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2001 Feb; 170(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11162781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Allergic reactivity for different dilutions of eugenol in repeated open application test and patch testing.
Ofenloch RF; Andersen KE; Foti C; Giménez-Arnau AM; Mowitz M; Salvador JFS; Svedman C; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2023 Aug; 89(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 37218587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Isoeugenol is an important contact allergen: can it be safely replaced with isoeugenyl acetate?
White IR; Johansen JD; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Rastogi S; Bruze M; Andersen KE; Frosch PJ; Goossens A; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Nov; 41(5):272-5. PubMed ID: 10554062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with isoeugenol.
Bruze M; Johansen JD; Andersen KE; Frosch P; Goossens A; Lepoittevin JP; Rastogi SC; White I; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 May; 52(5):260-7. PubMed ID: 15898999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency of allergic contact dermatitis to isoeugenol is increasing: a review of 3636 patients tested from 2001 to 2005.
White JM; White IR; Glendinning A; Fleming J; Jefferies D; Basketter DA; McFadden JP; Buckley DA
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Sep; 157(3):580-2. PubMed ID: 17573874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The dose-response relationship between the patch test and ROAT and the potential use for regulatory purposes.
Fischer LA; Voelund A; Andersen KE; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Oct; 61(4):201-8. PubMed ID: 19825091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by hydroperoxides of limonene and dose-response relationship-A repeated open application test (ROAT) study.
Bennike NH; Palangi L; Christensson JB; Nilsson U; Zachariae C; Johansen JD; Hagvall L
Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Apr; 80(4):208-216. PubMed ID: 30378136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products.
Frosch PJ; Rastogi SC; Pirker C; Brinkmeier T; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Johansen JD; Menne T
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):216-25. PubMed ID: 15859994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a questionnaire algorithm based on repeated open application testing with the constituents of fragrance mix I.
Bruze M; Engfeldt M; Ofenloch R; Elsner P; Goncalo M; Isaksson M; Naldi L; Schuttelaar ML; Svensson Å; Diepgen T
Br J Dermatol; 2020 Apr; 182(4):955-964. PubMed ID: 31206595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.
Fischer LA; Menné T; Avnstorp C; Kasting GB; Johansen JD
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Sep; 161(3):560-7. PubMed ID: 19486000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde- known as Lyral: quantitative aspects and risk assessment of an important fragrance allergen.
Johansen JD; Frosch PJ; Svedman C; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Pirker C; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Jun; 48(6):310-6. PubMed ID: 14531869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Threshold responses in cinnamic-aldehyde-sensitive subjects: results and methodological aspects.
Johansen JD; Andersen KE; Rastogi SC; Menne T
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Mar; 34(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 8833458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significant exposures to isoeugenol derivatives in perfumes.
Rastogi SC; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 May; 58(5):278-81. PubMed ID: 18416757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fragrance allergy: assessing the safety of washed fabrics.
Basketter DA; Pons-Guiraud A; van Asten A; Laverdet C; Marty JP; Martin L; Berthod D; Siest S; Giordano-Labadie F; Tennstedt D; Baeck M; Vigan M; Lainé G; Le Coz CJ; Jacobs MC; Bayrou O; Germaux MA
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Jun; 62(6):349-54. PubMed ID: 20557341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of questionnaire algorithm based on repeated open application testing with the constituents of fragrance mix II: the EDEN Fragrance Study.
Bruze M; Engfeldt M; Elsner P; Gonçalo M; Naldi L; Schuttelaar MLA; Svedman C; Svensson Å; Ofenloch R
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2021 Aug; 35(8):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 33914959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlations of patch test reactivity and the repeated open application test (ROAT)/provocative use test (PUT).
Villarama CD; Maibach HI
Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Nov; 42(11):1719-25. PubMed ID: 15350669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethosome formulation of contact allergens may enhance patch test reactions in patients.
Madsen JT; Vogel S; Karlberg AT; Simonsson C; Johansen JD; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Oct; 63(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 20731688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Myroxylon pereirae resin (balsam of Peru) - A critical review of the literature and assessment of the significance of positive patch test reactions and the usefulness of restrictive diets.
de Groot AC
Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Jun; 80(6):335-353. PubMed ID: 30843216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contact allergy to popular perfumes; assessed by patch test, use test and chemical analysis.
Johansen JD; Rastogi SC; Menné T
Br J Dermatol; 1996 Sep; 135(3):419-22. PubMed ID: 8949436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
