These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8879933)
1. The murine local lymph node assay: search for an alternative, more adequate, vehicle than acetone/olive oil (4:1). Montelius J; Boman A; Wahlkvist H; Wahlberg JE Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Jun; 34(6):428-30. PubMed ID: 8879933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Olive oil: suitability for use as a vehicle in the local lymph node assay. Basketter DA; Kimber I Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Sep; 35(3):190-1. PubMed ID: 8930495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Brown Norway rat asthma model of diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate (MDI): impact of vehicle for topical induction. Pauluhn J Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Feb; 50(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 17964702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of strain differences and vehicles on results of local lymph node assays. Anzai T; Ullmann LG; Hayashi D; Satoh T; Kumazawa T; Sato K Exp Anim; 2010; 59(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 20484859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a B cell marker (B220) to discriminate between allergens and irritants in the local lymph node assay. Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA; Hulette BC; Chaney JG; Skinner RA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I Toxicol Sci; 2002 Aug; 68(2):420-8. PubMed ID: 12151637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Murine local lymph node assay for predictive testing of allergenicity: two irritants caused significant proliferation. Montelius J; Wahlkvist H; Boman A; Wahlberg JE Acta Derm Venereol; 1998 Nov; 78(6):433-7. PubMed ID: 9833042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Selective modulation of B-cell activation markers CD86 and I-Ak on murine draining lymph node cells following allergen or irritant treatment. Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Miller CM; Ridder GM Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1999 Sep; 159(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 10495778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of application vehicle on skin sensitization to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone: an analysis using the local lymph node assay. Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Dec; 41(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 10617213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry. Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Synergistic response between thymus and lymph node cells in the mixed lymphocyte culture. Tittor W; Walford RL Nature; 1974 Feb; 247(5440):371-3. PubMed ID: 4274156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Experience with the murine local lymph node assay: inability to discriminate between allergens and irritants. Montelius J; Wahlkvist H; Boman A; Fernström P; Gråbergs L; Wahlberg JE Acta Derm Venereol; 1994 Jan; 74(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 7908482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of vehicle on assessment of relative skin sensitization potency of 1,4-dihydroquinone in the local lymph node assay. Lea LJ; Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 10594297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utilization of the ex vivo LLNA: BrdU-ELISA to distinguish the sensitizers from irritants in respect of 3 end points-lymphocyte proliferation, ear swelling, and cytokine profiles. Arancioglu S; Ulker OC; Karakaya A Int J Toxicol; 2015; 34(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 25563296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Local lymph node assay (LLNA): comparison of different protocols by testing skin-sensitizing epoxy resin system components. Gamer AO; Nies E; Vohr HW Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Dec; 52(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 18824053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of irritants on lymph node cell proliferation and the detection of contact sensitivity to metal salts in the murine local lymph node assay. Ikarashi Y; Tsukamoto Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Sep; 29(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 8222623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The murine local lymph node assay for identification of contact allergens: a preliminary evaluation of in situ measurement of lymphocyte proliferation. Kimber I; Hilton J; Weisenberger C Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Oct; 21(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 2598647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A nonradioisotopic endpoint for measurement of lymph node cell proliferation in a murine allergic contact dermatitis model, using bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry. Lee JK; Park JH; Park SH; Kim HS; Oh HY J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2002; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12750042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selective modulation of T cell memory markers CD62L and CD44 on murine draining lymph node cells following allergen and irritant treatment. Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Miller CM; Sikorski EE; Ridder GM Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1997 Sep; 146(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 9299591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitizing potential of chromated copper arsenate in local lymph node assays differs with the solvent used. Fukuyama T; Ueda H; Hayashi K; Tajima Y; Shuto Y; Kosaka T; Harada T J Immunotoxicol; 2008 Apr; 5(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 18569378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of ethanol:diethylphthalate as a vehicle for the local lymph node assay. Betts CJ; Beresford L; Dearman RJ; Lalko J; Api AP; Kimber I Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Feb; 56(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 17244073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]