These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8880183)

  • 1. Effects of pulse separation on detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the human cochlea.
    Pfingst BE; Holloway LA; Razzaque SA
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):77-92. PubMed ID: 8880183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochlea.
    Moon AK; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 1993 May; 67(1-2):166-78. PubMed ID: 8340268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interactions between pulse separation and pulse polarity order in cochlear implants.
    Miller AL; Morris DJ; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 1997 Jul; 109(1-2):21-33. PubMed ID: 9259233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. III. Pulse polarity.
    Coste RL; Pfingst BE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 May; 99(5):3099-108. PubMed ID: 8642120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. II: Frequency and interpulse interval.
    Pfingst BE; Morris DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1287-94. PubMed ID: 8408969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of electrical current configuration on stimulus detection.
    Pfingst BE; Miller AL; Morris DJ; Zwolan TA; Spelman FA; Clopton BM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():127-31. PubMed ID: 7668603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. I: Phase duration and stimulus duration.
    Pfingst BE; DeHaan DR; Holloway LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1857-66. PubMed ID: 1960279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavioral and neurophysiological thresholds for electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat.
    Beitel RE; Vollmer M; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Leake PA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 10686430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychophysical measures from electrical stimulation of the human cochlear nucleus.
    Shannon RV; Otto SR
    Hear Res; 1990 Aug; 47(1-2):159-68. PubMed ID: 2228792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of pulse trains in the electrically stimulated cochlea: effects of cochlear health.
    Pfingst BE; Colesa DJ; Hembrador S; Kang SY; Middlebrooks JC; Raphael Y; Su GL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):3954-68. PubMed ID: 22225050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals.
    Vollmer M; Beitel RE; Snyder RL
    J Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 86(5):2330-43. PubMed ID: 11698523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
    Carlyon RP; van Wieringen A; Deeks JM; Long CJ; Lyzenga J; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of electrode configuration on threshold functions for electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
    Pfingst BE; Morris DJ; Miller AL
    Hear Res; 1995 May; 85(1-2):76-84. PubMed ID: 7559181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates.
    Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 88(1-2):124-42. PubMed ID: 8575988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A model of threshold for pulsatile electrical stimulation of cochlear implants.
    Shannon RV
    Hear Res; 1989 Jul; 40(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 2793602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. amplitude growth functions.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 205(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 22209768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deafness alters auditory nerve fibre responses to cochlear implant stimulation.
    Sly DJ; Heffer LF; White MW; Shepherd RK; Birch MG; Minter RL; Nelson NE; Wise AK; O'Leary SJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 26(2):510-22. PubMed ID: 17650121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: II. Strength-duration functions for single, biphasic pulses.
    Miller AL; Smith DW; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 1999 Sep; 135(1-2):47-55. PubMed ID: 10491953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.