These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8880366)

  • 1. P300, stimulus intensity, modality, and probability.
    Polich J; Ellerson PC; Cohen J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1996; 23(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 8880366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. P300, stimulus intensity, and modality.
    Covington JW; Polich J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Nov; 100(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 8980423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: auditory intensity and tone frequency effects.
    Cass M; Polich J
    Biol Psychol; 1997 Jun; 46(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 9255431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: passive versus active tasks and stimulus modality.
    Mertens R; Polich J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Nov; 104(6):488-97. PubMed ID: 9402891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the number of trials needed for P300.
    Cohen J; Polich J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1997 Apr; 25(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 9105949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval.
    Gonsalvez CL; Polich J
    Psychophysiology; 2002 May; 39(3):388-96. PubMed ID: 12212658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. P300 and blink instructions.
    Ochoa CJ; Polich J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Jan; 111(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 10656515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. P300 and probability: comparison of oddball and single-stimulus paradigms.
    Polich J; Margala C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1997 Feb; 25(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 9101341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. P300 topography and modality effects from a single-stimulus paradigm.
    Polich J; Heine MR
    Psychophysiology; 1996 Nov; 33(6):747-52. PubMed ID: 8961797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alzheimer's disease and P300: review and evaluation of task and modality.
    Polich J; Corey-Bloom J
    Curr Alzheimer Res; 2005 Dec; 2(5):515-25. PubMed ID: 16375655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. P300 from auditory stimuli: intensity and frequency effects.
    Sugg MJ; Polich J
    Biol Psychol; 1995 Nov; 41(3):255-69. PubMed ID: 8608203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. P300 and handedness: on the possible contribution of corpus callosal size to ERPs.
    Polich J; Hoffman LD
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Sep; 35(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 9715094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemispheric differences for P300 amplitude from an auditory oddball task.
    Alexander JE; Bauer LO; Kuperman S; Morzorati S; O'Connor SJ; Rohrbaugh J; Porjesz B; Begleiter H; Polich J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1996; 21(2-3):189-96. PubMed ID: 8792206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Target-to-target interval, intensity, and P300 from an auditory single-stimulus task.
    Gonsalvez CJ; Barry RJ; Rushby JA; Polich J
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Mar; 44(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 17343708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. P3(00) habituation from auditory and visual stimuli.
    Romero R; Polich J
    Physiol Behav; 1996 Mar; 59(3):517-22. PubMed ID: 8700955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Poststimulus EEG spectral analysis and P300: attention, task, and probability.
    Spencer KM; Polich J
    Psychophysiology; 1999 Mar; 36(2):220-32. PubMed ID: 10194969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Target probability affects the likelihood that a P300 will be generated in response to a target stimulus, but not its amplitude.
    Bonala B; Boutros NN; Jansen BH
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Jan; 45(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 17971059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Event related potentials (ERPs) and behavioral responses: comparison of tonal stimuli to speech stimuli in phonological and semantic tasks.
    Geal-Dor M; Kamenir Y; Babkoff H
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2005; 16(2-3):139-55. PubMed ID: 16285466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. P300 component of the event-related potentials (ERP) during an attention task: effects of age, stimulus modality and event probability.
    Dujardin K; Derambure P; Bourriez JL; Jacquesson JM; Guieu JD
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1993 May; 14(3):255-67. PubMed ID: 8340244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microsaccadic inhibition and P300 enhancement in a visual oddball task.
    Valsecchi M; Dimigen O; Kliegl R; Sommer W; Turatto M
    Psychophysiology; 2009 May; 46(3):635-44. PubMed ID: 19226309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.