These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8880475)

  • 1. Why don't ruminal bacteria digest cellulose faster?
    Weimer PJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1996 Aug; 79(8):1496-502. PubMed ID: 8880475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative analysis of cellulose degradation and growth of cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen.
    Russell JB; Muck RE; Weimer PJ
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2009 Feb; 67(2):183-97. PubMed ID: 19120465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Invited review: adhesion mechanisms of rumen cellulolytic bacteria.
    Miron J; Ben-Ghedalia D; Morrison M
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Jun; 84(6):1294-309. PubMed ID: 11417686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ionized calcium requirement of rumen cellulolytic bacteria.
    Morales MS; Dehority BA
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5079-91. PubMed ID: 19762826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH?
    Russell JB; Wilson DB
    J Dairy Sci; 1996 Aug; 79(8):1503-9. PubMed ID: 8880476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kinetics of in sacco fiber-attachment of representative ruminal cellulolytic bacteria monitored by competitive PCR.
    Koike S; Pan J; Kobayashi Y; Tanaka K
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Apr; 86(4):1429-35. PubMed ID: 12741567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of diet on populations of three species of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria in lactating dairy cows.
    Weimer PJ; Waghorn GC; Odt CL; Mertens DR
    J Dairy Sci; 1999 Jan; 82(1):122-34. PubMed ID: 10022014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on ruminal bacteria that utilize lactate and digest cellulose.
    Callaway ES; Martin SA
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 Sep; 80(9):2035-44. PubMed ID: 9313145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial pH as a determinant of cellulose digestion rate by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro.
    Mouriño F; Akkarawongsa R; Weimer PJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Apr; 84(4):848-59. PubMed ID: 11352162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term defaunation increases the abundance of cellulolytic ruminococci and methanogens but does not affect the bacterial and methanogen diversity in the rumen of sheep.
    Mosoni P; Martin C; Forano E; Morgavi DP
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):783-91. PubMed ID: 21346137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Competition for cellulose among three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria under substrate-excess and substrate-limited conditions.
    Shi Y; Odt CL; Weimer PJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1997 Feb; 63(2):734-42. PubMed ID: 9023950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Localization of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria on plant fibrous materials as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization and real-time PCR.
    Shinkai T; Kobayashi Y
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 73(5):1646-52. PubMed ID: 17209077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competition among three predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria in the absence or presence of non-cellulolytic bacteria.
    Chen J; Weimer P
    Microbiology (Reading); 2001 Jan; 147(Pt 1):21-30. PubMed ID: 11160797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporation of [(15)N] ammonia by the cellulolytic ruminal bacteria Fibrobacter succinogenes BL2, Ruminococcus albus SY3, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens 17.
    Atasoglu C; Newbold CJ; Wallace RJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2001 Jun; 67(6):2819-22. PubMed ID: 11375199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    Yeoman CJ; Fields CJ; Lepercq P; Ruiz P; Forano E; White BA; Mosoni P
    mBio; 2021 Mar; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 33658330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro bacterial growth and in vivo ruminal microbiota populations associated with bloat in steers grazing wheat forage.
    Min BR; Pinchak WE; Anderson RC; Hume ME
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Oct; 84(10):2873-82. PubMed ID: 16971591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantification by real-time PCR of cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen of sheep after supplementation of a forage diet with readily fermentable carbohydrates: effect of a yeast additive.
    Mosoni P; Chaucheyras-Durand F; Béra-Maillet C; Forano E
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Dec; 103(6):2676-85. PubMed ID: 18045448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Competition between ruminal cellulolytic bacteria for adhesion to cellulose.
    Mosoni P; Fonty G; Gouet P
    Curr Microbiol; 1997 Jul; 35(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 9175559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Degradation of cellulose and forage fiber fractions by ruminal cellulolytic bacteria alone and in coculture with phenolic monomer-degrading bacteria.
    Varel VH; Jung HG; Krumholz LR
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Dec; 69(12):4993-5000. PubMed ID: 1667013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved animal production by genetic engineering of ruminal bacteria.
    Brooker JD; Thomson AM; Ward H
    Australas Biotechnol; 1992 Oct; 2(5):288-91. PubMed ID: 1368926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.