These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8881324)

  • 1. Accessing the particular from the general: the power of distinctiveness in the context of organization.
    Hunt RR; Smith RE
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Mar; 24(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 8881324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
    McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Context effects in recall and recognition at various retention intervals.
    Culross RR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1216-8. PubMed ID: 1501990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments.
    Schwartz BL; Metcalfe J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Sep; 18(5):1074-83. PubMed ID: 1402711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cued recall: implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses.
    Schreiber TA
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):553-71. PubMed ID: 9610124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequential effects in lexical decision: tests of compound-cue retrieval theory.
    Ratcliff R; McKoon G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1380-8. PubMed ID: 8744970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proactive interference and cuing effects in short-term cued recall: does foil context matter?
    Goh WD; Tan H
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1063-79. PubMed ID: 17128605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of data-driven and conceptually driven generation of study items on direct and indirect measures of memory.
    Flory P; Pring L
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Feb; 48(1):153-65. PubMed ID: 7754080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prior knowledge and cued recall: category size and dominance.
    Nelson DL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1985; 98(4):503-17. PubMed ID: 4096333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect.
    Kinoshita S
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):563-71. PubMed ID: 2796741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incongruous item generation effects: a multiple-cue perspective.
    Soraci SA; Franks JJ; Bransford JD; Chechile RA; Belli RF; Carr M; Carlin M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jan; 20(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 8138789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of elaboration and relational distinctiveness on sentence memory.
    McDaniel MA; Dunay PK; Lyman BJ; Kerwin ML
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(3):357-69. PubMed ID: 3177699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determinants of positive and negative generation effects in free recall.
    Steffens MC; Erdfelder E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 Nov; 51(4):705-33. PubMed ID: 9854440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect.
    Carpenter SK; DeLosh EL
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 16752591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of age of acquisition in memory: effects on judgements of learning and recall.
    Illman NA; Morrison CM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1665-71. PubMed ID: 21838653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention.
    Marsh RL; Hicks JL; Cook GI; Hansen JS; Pallos AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):861-70. PubMed ID: 14516219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of item-specific and relational information on hypermnesic recall.
    Klein SB; Loftus J; Kihlstrom JF; Aseron R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Nov; 15(6):1192-7. PubMed ID: 2530312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanisms underlying memory impairment in schizophrenia.
    Brébion G; Amador X; Smith MJ; Gorman JM
    Psychol Med; 1997 Mar; 27(2):383-93. PubMed ID: 9089831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.