These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8883075)
21. Literacy: a problem that managers must handle. Brownson K Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1998 Aug; 20(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 10181321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of diabetes and cardiovascular disease print patient education materials for use with low-health literate populations. Hill-Briggs F; Smith AS Diabetes Care; 2008 Apr; 31(4):667-71. PubMed ID: 18202245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Measuring patients' ability to read and comprehend: a first step in patient education. Wilson FL Nursingconnections; 1995; 8(4):17-25. PubMed ID: 8709997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Meeting the challenges of writing effective patient print material. Wong P CANNT J; 2001; 11(2):18-21, 26-8; quiz 22-4. PubMed ID: 11785323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Evaluation of quality and accessibility of health education materials. I. The opinion of health personnel]. Miller M; Supranowicz P; Targowski M; Piechowiak-Modrzejewska E Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2004; 55(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 15493343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. AIDS education for a low literate audience in Zambia. Msimuko AK IPPF Med Bull; 1988 Apr; 22(2):3-4. PubMed ID: 12315435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Suitability and readability assessment of educational print resources related to physical activity: implications and recommendations for practice. Vallance JK; Taylor LM; Lavallee C Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Aug; 72(2):342-9. PubMed ID: 18450409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Learning and support preferences of adult patients with cancer at a comprehensive cancer center. Chelf JH; Deshler AM; Thiemann KM; Dose AM; Quella SK; Hillman S Oncol Nurs Forum; 2002 Jun; 29(5):863-7. PubMed ID: 12058161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Online cancer communication: meeting the literacy, cultural and linguistic needs of diverse audiences. Neuhauser L; Kreps GL Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Jun; 71(3):365-77. PubMed ID: 18424046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Level of reading difficulty in educational pamphlets and informed consent documents for cancer patients. Jubelirer SJ W V Med J; 1991 Dec; 87(12):554-7. PubMed ID: 1812627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Measuring patients' ability to read and comprehend: a first step in patient education. Wilson FL Nursingconnections; 2000; 13(3):19-27. PubMed ID: 12017920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Patient education materials: are they readable? Stephens ST Oncol Nurs Forum; 1992; 19(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 1538991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of format modifications and reading comprehension on recall of informed consent information by low-income parents: a comparison of print, video, and computer-based presentations. Campbell FA; Goldman BD; Boccia ML; Skinner M Patient Educ Couns; 2004 May; 53(2):205-16. PubMed ID: 15140461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Health literacy: the gap between physicians and patients. Safeer RS; Keenan J Am Fam Physician; 2005 Aug; 72(3):463-8. PubMed ID: 16100861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Readability, suitability and comprehensibility in patient education materials for Swedish patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgery: a mixed method design. Smith F; Carlsson E; Kokkinakis D; Forsberg M; Kodeda K; Sawatzky R; Friberg F; Öhlén J Patient Educ Couns; 2014 Feb; 94(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 24290242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patient information handouts: taking care of yourself--a self-help guide for patients with cancer. Whitman-Obert HH Oncol Nurs Forum; 1996 Oct; 23(9):1443-5. PubMed ID: 8899761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Getting it right. Planning and pre-testing. AIDS Action; 1998; (40):3. PubMed ID: 12321635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Improving the quality of communication in organised cervical cancer screening programmes. Giordano L; Webster P; Anthony C; Szarewski A; Davies P; Arbyn M; Segnan N; Austoker J Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Jul; 72(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 18538725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Readability of written materials: implications for critical care nurses. Ott BB; Hardie TL Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 1995; 14(6):328-34. PubMed ID: 8631215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Communication techniques for patients with low health literacy: a survey of physicians, nurses, and pharmacists. Schwartzberg JG; Cowett A; VanGeest J; Wolf MS Am J Health Behav; 2007; 31 Suppl 1():S96-104. PubMed ID: 17931143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]