169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8883120)
1. Comparison of bone densitometry of the phalanges, distal forearm and axial skeleton in early postmenopausal women participating in the EPIC Study.
Ravn P; Overgaard K; Huang C; Ross PD; Green D; McClung M
Osteoporos Int; 1996; 6(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 8883120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of osteoporosis: comparison of radiographic absorptiometry of the phalanges and dual X-ray absorptiometry of the radius and lumbar spine.
Takada M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Grampp S; Jergas M; Glüer CC; Genant HK
Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):759-63. PubMed ID: 9051031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of bone mass in forearm, lumbar vertebra and hip by single and/or dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Qin M; Lin S; Song Z; Tian J; Chen F; Yan H; Ge Q
Chin Med Sci J; 1999 Jun; 14(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 12901622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of radiographic absorptiometry with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography in normal older white and black women.
Kleerekoper M; Nelson DA; Flynn MJ; Pawluszka AS; Jacobsen G; Peterson EL
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Nov; 9(11):1745-9. PubMed ID: 7863826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?
Damilakis J; Papadokostakis G; Perisinakis K; Hadjipavlou A; Gourtsoyiannis N
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Aug; 14(8):688-93. PubMed ID: 12897977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.
Clowes JA; Peel NF; Eastell R
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1293-302. PubMed ID: 16810454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Grampp S; Lang P; Jergas M; Glüer CC; Mathur A; Engelke K; Genant HK
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Oct; 10(10):1566-76. PubMed ID: 8686514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone densitometry of the forearm: comparison of single-photon and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Eckert P; Casez JP; Thiébaud D; Schnyder P; Burckhardt P
Bone; 1996 Jun; 18(6):575-9. PubMed ID: 8805999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Precision and accuracy of computed digital absorptiometry for assessment of bone density of the hand.
Bouxsein ML; Michaeli DA; Plass DB; Schick DA; Melton ME
Osteoporos Int; 1997; 7(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 9425502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: precision, correlation, and reference data.
Kelly TL; Crane G; Baran DT
Calcif Tissue Int; 1994 Mar; 54(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 8055369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences in precision in bone mineral density measured by SXA and DXA: the NOREPOS study.
Forsén L; Berntsen GK; Meyer HE; Tell GS; Fønnebø V;
Eur J Epidemiol; 2008; 23(9):615-24. PubMed ID: 18594994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ability of peripheral DXA measurements of the forearm to predict low axial bone mineral density at menopause.
Pouillès JM; Tremollières FA; Martinez S; Delsol M; Ribot C
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 11305086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Forearm bone mineral densitometry cannot be used to monitor response to alendronate therapy in postmenopausal women.
Bouxsein ML; Parker RA; Greenspan SL
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(6):505-9. PubMed ID: 10663352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Engelke K; Libanati C; Liu Y; Wang H; Austin M; Fuerst T; Stampa B; Timm W; Genant HK
Bone; 2009 Jul; 45(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 19345291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term change in the bone mineral density of adults with adult onset growth hormone (GH) deficiency in response to short or long-term GH replacement therapy.
Rahim A; Holmes SJ; Adams JE; Shalet SM
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 1998 Apr; 48(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 9640413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiographic absorptiometry for bone mineral measurement of the phalanges: precision and accuracy study.
Yang SO; Hagiwara S; Engelke K; Dhillon MS; Guglielmi G; Bendavid EJ; Soejima O; Nelson DL; Genant HK
Radiology; 1994 Sep; 192(3):857-9. PubMed ID: 8058960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early postmenopausal diminution of forearm and spinal bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study.
Bjarnason K; Hassager C; Ravn P; Christiansen C
Osteoporos Int; 1995 Jan; 5(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 7703622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prevention of bone loss with alendronate in postmenopausal women under 60 years of age. Early Postmenopausal Intervention Cohort Study Group.
Hosking D; Chilvers CE; Christiansen C; Ravn P; Wasnich R; Ross P; McClung M; Balske A; Thompson D; Daley M; Yates AJ
N Engl J Med; 1998 Feb; 338(8):485-92. PubMed ID: 9443925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
