181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8883195)
1. The role of imaging and in situ biomechanical testing in assessing pedicle screw pull-out strength.
Myers BS; Belmont PJ; Richardson WJ; Yu JR; Harper KD; Nightingale RW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Sep; 21(17):1962-8. PubMed ID: 8883195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characteristics of immediate and fatigue strength of a dual-threaded pedicle screw in cadaveric spines.
Brasiliense LB; Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Turner JL; Crandall DG; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):947-56. PubMed ID: 23602373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed tomography and biomechanical evaluation of screw fixation options at the cervicothoracic junction: intralamina versus intrapedicular techniques.
Cardoso MJ; Dmitriev AE; Lehman RA; Helgeson M; Cooper P; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(24):2612-7. PubMed ID: 19011542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting the integrity of vertebral bone screw fixation in anterior spinal instrumentation.
Snyder BD; Zaltz I; Hall JE; Emans JB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jul; 20(14):1568-74. PubMed ID: 7570171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Novel Method for the Prediction of the Pedicle Screw Stability: Regional Bone Mineral Density Around the Screw.
Ishikawa K; Toyone T; Shirahata T; Kudo Y; Matsuoka A; Maruyama H; Hayakawa C; Tani S; Sekimizu M; Tsuchiya K; Eguro T; Oshita Y; Ozawa T; Nakao Y; Sano S; Nagai T; Kanzaki K; Inagaki K
Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Nov; 31(9):E473-E480. PubMed ID: 30102636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative dual-energy CT for phantomless evaluation of cancellous bone mineral density of the vertebral pedicle: correlation with pedicle screw pull-out strength.
Wichmann JL; Booz C; Wesarg S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Fischer S; Lehnert T; Vogl TJ; Khan MF; Kafchitsas K
Eur Radiol; 2015 Jun; 25(6):1714-20. PubMed ID: 25481639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tapping insertional torque allows prediction for better pedicle screw fixation and optimal screw size selection.
Helgeson MD; Kang DG; Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE; Luhmann SJ
Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):957-65. PubMed ID: 23602374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advantage of pedicle screw fixation directed into the apex of the sacral promontory over bicortical fixation: a biomechanical analysis.
Lehman RA; Kuklo TR; Belmont PJ; Andersen RC; Polly DW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(8):806-11. PubMed ID: 11935101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical analysis of different types of pedicle screw augmentation: a cadaveric and synthetic bone sample study of instrumented vertebral specimens.
Chao KH; Lai YS; Chen WC; Chang CM; McClean CJ; Fan CY; Chang CH; Lin LC; Cheng CK
Med Eng Phys; 2013 Oct; 35(10):1506-12. PubMed ID: 23669371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical Comparisons of Pull Out Strengths After Pedicle Screw Augmentation with Hydroxyapatite, Calcium Phosphate, or Polymethylmethacrylate in the Cadaveric Spine.
Yi S; Rim DC; Park SW; Murovic JA; Lim J; Park J
World Neurosurg; 2015 Jun; 83(6):976-81. PubMed ID: 25769482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using lamina screws as a salvage technique at C-7: computed tomography and biomechanical analysis using cadaveric vertebrae. Laboratory investigation.
Cardoso MJ; Dmitriev AE; Helgeson MD; Stephens F; Campbell V; Lehman RA; Cooper P; Rosner MK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Jul; 11(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 19569937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Krag versus Caudad trajectory technique for pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical comparison and analysis.
Yuan Q; Han X; Han X; He D; Liu B; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Dec; 39(26 Spec No.):B27-35. PubMed ID: 25504099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision pedicle screws. Bigger, longer shims--what is best?
Polly DW; Orchowski JR; Ellenbogen RG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun; 23(12):1374-9. PubMed ID: 9654629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws.
Zhuang XM; Yu BS; Zheng ZM; Zhang JF; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E925-31. PubMed ID: 20098349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjustment of suboptimally placed lumbar pedicle screws decreases pullout strength and alters biomechanics of the construct: a pilot cadaveric study.
Wadhwa RK; Thakur JD; Khan IS; James J; Ahmed O; Zhang S; Henderson B; Ogden A; Guthikonda B; Nanda A
World Neurosurg; 2015 Mar; 83(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 24793978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acute and long-term stability of atlantoaxial fixation methods: a biomechanical comparison of pars, pedicle, and intralaminar fixation in an intact and odontoid fracture model.
Dmitriev AE; Lehman RA; Helgeson MD; Sasso RC; Kuhns C; Riew DK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 19214095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Insertional torque and pull-out strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws in cadaveric bone.
Kwok AW; Finkelstein JA; Woodside T; Hearn TC; Hu RW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Nov; 21(21):2429-34. PubMed ID: 8923627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative estimation of screw fixation strength in vertebral bodies.
Eysel P; Schwitalle M; Oberstein A; Rompe JD; Hopf C; Küllmer K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jan; 23(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 9474722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pull out Strength of Dual Outer Diameter Pedicle Screws Compared to Uncemented and Cemented Standard Pedicle Screws: A Biomechanical in vitro Study.
Lorenz A; Leichtle CI; Frantz S; Bumann M; Tsiflikas I; Shiozawa T; Leichtle UG
Orthop Surg; 2017 May; 9(2):229-236. PubMed ID: 28547867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Pull-Out Strength between a Novel Micro-Dynamic Pedicle Screw and a Traditional Pedicle Screw in Lumbar Spine.
Qian L; Chen W; Li P; Qu D; Liang W; Zheng M; Ouyang J
Orthop Surg; 2020 Aug; 12(4):1285-1292. PubMed ID: 32776487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
