These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8883516)

  • 1. Criteria for the assessment of intrinsic performances of digital radiographic intraoral sensors.
    Mondou D; Bonnet E; Coudert JL; Jourlin M; Molteni R; Pachod V
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Sep; 3(9):751-7. PubMed ID: 8883516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.
    Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standards for intraoral radiographic imaging.
    Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10980558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resolution as defined by line spread and modulation transfer functions for four digital intraoral radiographic systems.
    Welander U; McDavid WD; Sanderink GC; Tronje G; Mörner AC; Dove SB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 8078652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessments of the physical performance of 2 generations of 2 direct digital intraoral sensors.
    Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Oct; 88(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 10519766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the performance of intraoral X-ray sensors using objective image quality assessment.
    Hellén-Halme K; Johansson C; Nilsson M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 May; 121(5):e129-37. PubMed ID: 27068317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correction of background noise in direct digital dental radiography.
    Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H; Sasaki T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):256-62. PubMed ID: 9161179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems.
    Udupa H; Mah P; Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Dec; 116(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 24237729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flash Dent: an alternative charge-coupled device/scintillator-based direct digital intraoral radiographic system.
    Scarfe WC; Farman AG; Kelly MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 8181653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct digital dental x-ray imaging with visualix/VIXA.
    Molteni R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Aug; 76(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 8361738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of two intraoral CCD sensor systems in terms of image quality and interobserver agreement.
    Schulze D; Rother UJ; Fuhrmann AW; Tietke M
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Apr; 6(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 14552151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Film-less digital x-ray image processing--new prospects with the RadioVisioGraphy equipment].
    Mairgünther RH
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1994; 104(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 8108689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical performance measures of radiographic imaging systems.
    Workman A; Brettle DS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 9442599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital radiographic imaging: is the dental practice ready?
    Parks ET
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Apr; 139(4):477-81. PubMed ID: 18385032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Principles of digital imaging.
    van der Stelt PF
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):237-48, v. PubMed ID: 10740766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of direct intraoral sensors in the provision of endodontic services.
    Lavelle CL
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1999 Feb; 15(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 10219147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital imaging modalities for dental practice.
    Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2001 Feb; 42(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11484791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The modulation transfer function and signal-to-noise ratio of different digital filters: a technical approach.
    Brüllmann DD; d'Hoedt B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 May; 40(4):222-9. PubMed ID: 21493878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.