These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8883516)

  • 21. Sens-A-Ray. A new system for direct digital intraoral radiography.
    Nelvig P; Wing K; Welander U
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 1488241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficacy of digital intra-oral radiography in clinical dentistry.
    Versteeg CH; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):215-24. PubMed ID: 9175348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Buyers's guide to digital radiograph-intraoral sensors. Examining one of dentistry's most effective diagnostic tools.
    Dent Today; 2009 Mar; 28(3):126, 128-33. PubMed ID: 19343834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films.
    Sanderink GC; Huiskens R; van der Stelt PF; Welander US; Stheeman SE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8078654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of three methods of geometric image reconstruction for digital subtraction radiography.
    Queiroz PM; Oliveira ML; Tanaka JL; Soares MG; Haiter-Neto F; Ono E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160120. PubMed ID: 27376702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of physical properties of different digital intraoral sensors.
    Al-Rawi W; Teich S
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Sep; 34(8):e76-83. PubMed ID: 24568289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How to improve digital dental radiograph reproducibility: an individualized technique.
    Muratore F; Tripodi D; Teté S; de Fazio P; Festa F
    Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Apr; 4(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 11692661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patient comfort in periapical examination using digital receptors.
    Gonçalves A; Wiezel VG; Gonçalves M; Hebling J; Sannomiya EK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):484-8. PubMed ID: 19767521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.
    Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
    Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Guide to Digital Radiographic Imaging.
    Mol A; Yoon DC
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Sep; 43(9):503-11. PubMed ID: 26820007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of different exposure values on diagnostic accuracy of digital images.
    Pfeiffer P; Schmage P; Nergiz I; Platzer U
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 11203933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intraoral detectors. CCD, CMOS, TFT, and other devices.
    Sanderink GC; Miles DA
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):249-55, v. PubMed ID: 10740767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stationary intraoral digital tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
    Shan J; Tucker AW; Gaalaas LR; Wu G; Platin E; Mol A; Lu J; Zhou O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(9):20150098. PubMed ID: 26090933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital imaging for dental caries.
    Wenzel A
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):319-38, vi. PubMed ID: 10740771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiography for detecting misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; Vizzotto MB; Da Silveira PF; Silveira HE; Wenzel A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25311793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of the reproducibility of the gray values and noise of a direct digital radiography system.
    Poleti ML; Fernandes TM; Teixeira RC; Capelozza AL; Rubira-Bullen IR
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 26017488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Digital radiography in dentistry: what it should do for you.
    White SC; Yoon DC; Tetradis S
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1999 Dec; 27(12):942-52. PubMed ID: 10726560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.