These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8884638)

  • 1. Quadratic calibration curves for the Periotron 6000.
    Preshaw PM; Kelly PJ; Heasman PA
    J Periodontal Res; 1996 Aug; 31(6):441-3. PubMed ID: 8884638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calibration of the Periotron 8000 and 6000 by polynomial regression.
    Chapple IL; Landini G; Griffiths GS; Patel NC; Ward RS
    J Periodontal Res; 1999 Feb; 34(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 10207836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calibration and reliability of the Periotron 6000 for individual gingival crevicular fluid samples.
    Chapple IL; Cross IA; Glenwright HD; Matthews JB
    J Periodontal Res; 1995 Jan; 30(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 7722849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Periotron 8000: calibration characteristics and reliability.
    Ciantar M; Caruana DJ
    J Periodontal Res; 1998 Jul; 33(5):259-64. PubMed ID: 9777592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of standardized narrow strips in the Periotron.
    Asikainen S; Etemadzadeh H; Ainamo J
    J Periodontol; 1985 Nov; 56(11):686-9. PubMed ID: 3903103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Error variance and sensitivity associated with three different Periotron instruments.
    van der Bijl P; Dreyer WP; Kotze TJ
    J Periodontal Res; 1986 Jul; 21(4):445-8. PubMed ID: 2942673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The evaluation of the periotron.
    Garnick JJ; Pearson R; Harrell D
    J Periodontol; 1979 Aug; 50(8):424-6. PubMed ID: 383944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative error (variability) associated with an improved instrument for measuring gingival crevicular fluid.
    Hinrichs JE; Bandt CL; Smith JA
    J Periodontol; 1984 May; 55(5):294-8. PubMed ID: 6376758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodological considerations in GCF sampling with paper strips: poor recovery of uncomplexed elastase.
    Gustafsson A
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 May; 23(5):432-6. PubMed ID: 8783047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection of a filter paper with optimum properties for the collection of gingival crevicular fluid.
    Griffiths GS; Curtis MA; Wilton JM
    J Periodontal Res; 1988 Jan; 23(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 2963902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of 3 systems for quantifying gingival crevicular fluid with respect to linearity and the effects of qualitative differences in fluids.
    Hinrichs JE; Bandt CL; Smith JA; Golub LM
    J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Nov; 11(10):652-61. PubMed ID: 6389610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Critical steps in electronic volume quantification of gingival crevicular fluid: the potential impact of evaporation, fluid retention, local conditions and repeated measurements.
    Tözüm TF; Hatipoğlu H; Yamalik N; Gürsel M; Alptekin NO; Ataoğlu T; Marakoğlu I; Gürsoy UK; Eratalay K
    J Periodontal Res; 2004 Oct; 39(5):344-57. PubMed ID: 15324356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparative study of the reproducibility of the measurements of the Periotron].
    Schorn H; Geurtsen W; Ketterl W
    ZWR; 1986 Aug; 95(8):834-6. PubMed ID: 3538697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of an alternative device for volumetric quantification of crevicular fluid.
    Alencar FG; Kronbauer GC; Gomes SC
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2011; 24(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 22010403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Quantitative measurement of sulcus fluid with new self-coloring paper indicator strips: a comparison with Periotron].
    Kohlbecker G; Grzonka M; Günay H
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1989; 99(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 2665068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of volume measurements with the new Periotron 6000.
    Bickel M; Cimasoni G
    J Periodontal Res; 1984 May; 19(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 6235347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The periotron gingival crevicular fluid meter. An assessment of three different instruments.
    van der Bijl P; Dreyer WP; Grobler SR
    J Periodontal Res; 1986 Jan; 21(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 2937893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Relation of periodontal pocket depth to the level of crevicular fluid measured by the Periotron].
    Maioli S; Maselli R
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1985; 4(3):37-40. PubMed ID: 3914980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of filter-strip sampling of gingival crevicular fluid for volume determination using the Periotron.
    Stewart JE; Christenson PD; Maeder LA; Palmer MA
    J Periodontal Res; 1993 May; 28(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 8496785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical significance of gingival fluid measurement by "Periotron".
    Tsuchida K; Hara K
    J Periodontol; 1981 Nov; 52(11):697-700. PubMed ID: 7028943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.