These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8885094)
1. Improved determination of breast cancer size in mammography. Sphiris N; Panayiotakis G; Proimos B; Likaki H; Tzoracoleftherakis E Technol Health Care; 1996 Aug; 4(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 8885094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The importance of mammography for the determination of tumor size in stage classification of breast cancer according to the TNM system (5-years-results) (author's transl)]. Hüttner J; Berndt H; Eichhorn HJ Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1979; 49(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 383036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A tumour gauge to measure breast lumps for use with mammograms. Gordon AB Eur J Surg Oncol; 1985 Jun; 11(2):197-8. PubMed ID: 4007177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of breast cancer size: a comparison of methods. Pain JA; Ebbs SR; Hern RP; Lowe S; Bradbeer JW Eur J Surg Oncol; 1992 Feb; 18(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 1737593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Further experience with microfocal spot magnification mammography in the assessment of clustered breast microcalcifications. Sickles EA Radiology; 1980 Oct; 137(1 Pt 1):9-14. PubMed ID: 7422866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of mammography for detecting early breast cancer in women under 50. Yokoe T; Iino Y; Maemura M; Takei H; Horiguchi J; Matsumoto H; Morishita Y; Koibuchi Y Anticancer Res; 1998; 18(6B):4709-11. PubMed ID: 9891545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Breast saving therapy of breast cancer: sensitivity of mammography in relation to primary tumor size]. Stierli P; Spichtig S; Aeberhard P Helv Chir Acta; 1992 May; 59(1):247-52. PubMed ID: 1526836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical assessment of tumour size in primary breast carcinoma. Dixon JM; Senbanjo RO; Anderson TJ; Forrest AP; Elton RA Clin Oncol; 1984 Jun; 10(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 6734003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can computer-aided detection be detrimental to mammographic interpretation? Philpotts LE Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19789251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Correspondence of mammographic and pathological-anatomical tumor extent in breast cancer]. Röder HU; Schäfer L; Schmidt B; Walter E Rofo; 1991 Mar; 154(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 1849303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography. Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Perioperative ultrasound examination of the breast in breast cancer]. Ernst R; Weber A; Bauer KH; Friemann J; Zumtobel V Zentralbl Chir; 1990; 115(15):963-75. PubMed ID: 2238972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study. Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of findings suspicious for breast cancer based on natural language processing of mammogram reports. Jain NL; Friedman C Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1997; ():829-33. PubMed ID: 9357741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of raster mammography and real time sonography with histology in carcinoma of the breast]. Stauch G; Majewski A; Pollak F; Hilfrich J Rofo; 1988 Oct; 149(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 2845509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of mammography on breast biopsy. Goedde TA; Frykberg ER; Crump JM; Lay SF; Turetsky DB; Linden SS Am Surg; 1992 Nov; 58(11):661-6. PubMed ID: 1485695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]