194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8885350)
1. Brush cytology for pancreatic carcinoma: an analysis of factors influencing results.
McGuire DE; Venu RP; Brown RD; Etzkorn KP; Glaws WR; Abu-Hammour A
Gastrointest Endosc; 1996 Sep; 44(3):300-4. PubMed ID: 8885350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP.
Macken E; Drijkoningen M; Van Aken E; Van Steenbergen W
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2000; 63(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 11189981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and complication rate of brush cytology from bile duct versus pancreatic duct.
Vandervoort J; Soetikno RM; Montes H; Lichtenstein DR; Van Dam J; Ruymann FW; Cibas ES; Carr-Locke DL
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):322-7. PubMed ID: 10049415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies.
Ferrari Júnior AP; Lichtenstein DR; Slivka A; Chang C; Carr-Locke DL
Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):140-5. PubMed ID: 8013810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biliary brush cytology in the assessment of biliary strictures at a tertiary center in Iran.
Mohammad Alizadeh AH; Mousavi M; Salehi B; Molaei M; Khodadoostan M; Afzali ES; Dadvar Z; Mirsattari D; Aghdaei HA; Lahmi F; Zali MR
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(10):2793-6. PubMed ID: 22320994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The combination of stricture dilation, endoscopic needle aspiration, and biliary brushings significantly improves diagnostic yield from malignant bile duct strictures.
Farrell RJ; Jain AK; Brandwein SL; Wang H; Chuttani R; Pleskow DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Nov; 54(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 11677474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Usefulness of brush cytology combined with pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: significance of pancreatic juice cytology after brushing.
Yamaguchi T; Shirai Y; Nakamura N; Sudo K; Nakamura K; Hironaka S; Hara T; Denda T
Pancreas; 2012 Nov; 41(8):1225-9. PubMed ID: 23086246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biliary Brush Cytology Revisited.
Mehmood S; Loya A; Yusuf MA
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 27221813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study.
Fogel EL; deBellis M; McHenry L; Watkins JL; Chappo J; Cramer H; Schmidt S; Lazzell-Pannell L; Sherman S; Lehman GA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Jan; 63(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 16377319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scraping cytology with a guidewire for pancreatic-ductal strictures.
Uehara H; Tatsumi K; Masuda E; Kato M; Kizu T; Ishida T; Takakura R; Takano Y; Nakaizumi A; Ishikawa O; Takenaka A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jul; 70(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 19249043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of flow cytometry for DNA content and brush cytology for detection of malignancy in pancreaticobiliary strictures.
Ryan ME; Baldauf MC
Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):133-9. PubMed ID: 8013809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endoscopic cytology in biliary strictures. Personal experience.
Geraci G; Pisello F; Arnone E; Modica G; Sciumè C
G Chir; 2008 Oct; 29(10):403-6. PubMed ID: 18947461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of stricture dilation and repeat brushing on the cancer detection rate of brush cytology in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction.
de Bellis M; Fogel EL; Sherman S; Watkins JL; Chappo J; Younger C; Cramer H; Lehman GA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Aug; 58(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 12872082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective randomised study of dense Infinity cytological brush versus regularly used brush in pancreaticobiliary malignancy.
Kylänpää L; Boyd S; Ristimäki A; Lindström O; Udd M; Halttunen J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016; 51(5):590-3. PubMed ID: 26642244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic retrograde forceps biopsy and brush cytology of biliary strictures: a prospective study.
Pugliese V; Conio M; Nicolò G; Saccomanno S; Gatteschi B
Gastrointest Endosc; 1995 Dec; 42(6):520-6. PubMed ID: 8674921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic yield of brush cytology for biliary stenosis during ERCP.
Temiño López-Jurado R; Cacho Acosta G; Argüelles Pintos M; Rodríguez Caravaca G; Lledó Navarro JL; Fernández Rodríguez C
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2009 Jun; 101(6):385-9, 390-4. PubMed ID: 19630461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic yield and accuracy of a new cytology brush design compared to standard brush cytology for evaluation of biliary strictures.
Bank JS; Witt BL; Taylor LJ; Adler DG
Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Mar; 46(3):234-238. PubMed ID: 29230974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures.
Kurzawinski TR; Deery A; Dooley JS; Dick R; Hobbs KE; Davidson BR
Hepatology; 1993 Dec; 18(6):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8244264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Forceps biopsy and brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of biliary stenoses.
Schoefl R; Haefner M; Wrba F; Pfeffel F; Stain C; Poetzi R; Gangl A
Scand J Gastroenterol; 1997 Apr; 32(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 9140159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
