These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8885797)
1. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: diagnostic criteria and management. Kaufman RH Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 175(4 Pt 2):1120-8. PubMed ID: 8885797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness. Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Qualifying the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" affects the predictive value of a squamous intraepithelial lesion on subsequent biopsy. Genest DR; Dean B; Lee KR; Sheets E; Crum CP; Cibas ES Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):338-41. PubMed ID: 9648902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Atypical squamous cells and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in cervical cytology: cytohistological correlation and implication for management in a low-resource setting. Gupta N; Srinivasan R; Nijhawan R; Rajwanshi A; Dey P; Suri V; Dhaliwal L Cytopathology; 2011 Jun; 22(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 20629683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of human papillomavirus testing for intermediate- and high-risk types as triage before colposcopy. Hatch KD; Schneider A; Abdel-Nour MW Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 172(4 Pt 1):1150-5; discussion 1155-7. PubMed ID: 7726250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Management of atypical squamous cells, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1. Boardman LA; Kennedy CM Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):599-614; ix. PubMed ID: 19061819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Review of the Bethesda System atlas does not improve reproducibility or accuracy in the classification of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance smears. Smith AE; Sherman ME; Scott DR; Tabbara SO; Dworkin L; Olson J; Thompson J; Faser C; Snell J; Schiffman M Cancer; 2000 Aug; 90(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 10966559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Follow up of atypical squamous cell Pap smears in Iraqi women. Pity IS; Shamdeen MY; Wais SA Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(7):3455-60. PubMed ID: 22994777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on ThinPrep papanicolaou smears. Eltabbakh GH; Lipman JN; Mount SL; Morgan A Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11006029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Geier CS; Wilson M; Creasman W Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jan; 184(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 11174481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. From Papanicolaou to Bethesda: the rationale for a new cervical cytologic classification. Kurman RJ; Malkasian GD; Sedlis A; Solomon D Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):779-82. PubMed ID: 1849626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of atypical squamous (glandular) cells of undetermined significance smears by neural network-directed review. Kaufman RH; Schreiber K; Carter T Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Apr; 91(4):556-60. PubMed ID: 9540940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical implications of the diagnosis "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" in pregnant women. Onuma K; Saad RS; Kanbour-Shakir A; Kanbour AI; Dabbs DJ Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):282-7. PubMed ID: 16991139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristic findings of cervical Papanicolaou tests from transgender patients on androgen therapy: Challenges in detecting dysplasia. Adkins BD; Barlow AB; Jack A; Schultenover SJ; Desouki MM; Coogan AC; Weiss VL Cytopathology; 2018 Jun; 29(3):281-287. PubMed ID: 29488269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical significance of the qualification of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: An analysis on the basis of histologic diagnoses. Vlahos NP; Dragisic KG; Wallach EE; Burroughs FH; Fluck S; Rosenthal DL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Apr; 182(4):885-90. PubMed ID: 10764467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears. Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "ASCUS, rule out HSIL": cytologic features, histologic correlates, and human papillomavirus detection. Sherman ME; Tabbara SO; Scott DR; Kurman RJ; Glass AG; Manos MM; Burk RD; Rush BB; Schiffman M Mod Pathol; 1999 Apr; 12(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 10229496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in girls and women. Wright JD; Pinto AB; Powell MA; Lu DW; Gao F; Pinto KR Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 103(4):632-8. PubMed ID: 15051551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]