These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8886060)
1. Radiographic prognostic criteria for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: a study of 485 patients. Bon D; Dore B; Irani J; Marroncle M; Aubert J Urology; 1996 Oct; 48(4):556-60; discussion 560-1. PubMed ID: 8886060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Correlation between chemical composition, density, and results of extracorporal lithotripsy in renal and ureteral lumbar calculi]. Bon D; Doré B; Irani J; Duverger P; Aubert J Prog Urol; 1992; 2(4):577-86. PubMed ID: 1302097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Results of extracorporeal lithotripsy with ultrasonography-guided hydroelectric lithotriptor: study on 546 patients, prognosis factors]. Bon D; Doré B; Irani J; Marroncle M; Ingrand P; Aubert J Prog Urol; 1995 Nov; 5(5):671-8. PubMed ID: 8580977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can a dual-energy computed tomography predict unsuitable stone components for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? Ahn SH; Oh TH; Seo IY Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):644-9. PubMed ID: 26366277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Hounsfield Units as a predictive factor for the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and stone composition. Nakasato T; Morita J; Ogawa Y Urolithiasis; 2015 Feb; 43(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 25139151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The case for primary endoscopic management of upper urinary tract calculi: I. A critical review of 121 extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy failures. Grasso M; Loisides P; Beaghler M; Bagley D Urology; 1995 Mar; 45(3):363-71. PubMed ID: 7879329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. University of Wisconsin experience using the Doli S lithotriptor. Johnson DB; Lowry PS; Schluckebier JA; Kryger JV; Nakada SY Urology; 2003 Sep; 62(3):410-4; discussion 414-5. PubMed ID: 12946735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi. Gupta NP; Ansari MS; Kesarvani P; Kapoor A; Mukhopadhyay S BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1285-8. PubMed ID: 15892818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower calyx calculi: how much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system? Danuser H; Müller R; Descoeudres B; Dobry E; Studer UE Eur Urol; 2007 Aug; 52(2):539-46. PubMed ID: 17400366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with solitary pure calcium oxalate stones smaller than 1.0 cm in the proximal ureter, with special reference to monohydrate and dihydrate content. Ichiyanagi O; Nagaoka A; Izumi T; Kawamura Y; Tsukigi M; Ishii T; Ohji H; Kato T; Tomita Y Scand J Urol; 2013 Apr; 47(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 22870910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. Elbahnasy AM; Shalhav AL; Hoenig DM; Elashry OM; Smith DS; McDougall EM; Clayman RV J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 9474124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical application of Sonolith 3000 type on extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal and ureteral stones]. Oka T; Hara T; Miyake O; Kobayashi Y; Yasunaga Y; Matsumiya K; Takaha M Hinyokika Kiyo; 1990 Oct; 36(10):1203-11. PubMed ID: 2264549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiologic contribution to the management of patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Dyer RB; Zagoria RJ; Auringer ST; Ainge GR; McCullough DL; Assimos DG; Boyce WH; Harrison LH; Kroovand RL; Chen YM Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1988; 28(4):295-330. PubMed ID: 3053044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? Lim KH; Jung JH; Kwon JH; Lee YS; Bae J; Cho MC; Lee KS; Lee HW Korean J Urol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 25598937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of ultrasound monitoring during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A multi-institutional propensity score-matched study. Isogai M; Hamamoto S; Kawase K; Okada T; Hattori T; Chaya R; Hamakawa T; Sugino T; Taguchi K; Umemoto Y; Okada A; Yasui T Int J Urol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):1054-1060. PubMed ID: 35871263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of success rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal stones--a multivariate analysis model. Abdel-Khalek M; Sheir KZ; Mokhtar AA; Eraky I; Kenawy M; Bazeed M Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2004; 38(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 15204407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy--difficulties in ESWL]. Oka T; Okuyama A; Fujisue H; Itatani H; Park YC; Wakabayashi A; Takada M; Uemura T; Kori K; Kanbara N Hinyokika Kiyo; 1987 Aug; 33(8):1157-61. PubMed ID: 3425514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm. El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calcium oxalate stone morphology: fine tuning our therapeutic distinctions. Dretler SP; Polykoff G J Urol; 1996 Mar; 155(3):828-33. PubMed ID: 8583586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]