These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8886864)

  • 1. Long-term survival and cost-effectiveness of five dental restorative materials used in various classes of cavity preparations.
    Smales RJ; Hawthorne WS
    Int Dent J; 1996 Jun; 46(3):126-30. PubMed ID: 8886864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term cost-effectiveness of single indirect restorations in selected dental practices.
    Kelly PG; Smales RJ
    Br Dent J; 2004 May; 196(10):639-43; discussion 627. PubMed ID: 15153977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.
    Paolantonio M; D'ercole S; Perinetti G; Tripodi D; Catamo G; Serra E; Bruè C; Piccolomini R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of restorative materials on marginal gingiva.
    Willershausen B; Köttgen C; Ernst CP
    Eur J Med Res; 2001 Oct; 6(10):433-9. PubMed ID: 11698230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure.
    Malament KA; Socransky SS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 11725279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parental attitudes on restorative materials as factors influencing current use in pediatric dentistry.
    Zimmerman JA; Feigal RJ; Till MJ; Hodges JS
    Pediatr Dent; 2009; 31(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 19320262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relative cost of different restorations in the UK.
    Mjör IA; Burke FJ; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 1997 Apr; 182(8):286-9. PubMed ID: 9154703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conservative indirect restorations for posterior teeth. Cast versus bonded ceramic.
    Donovan TE; Chee WW
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 8348996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term survival of extensive amalgams and posterior crowns.
    Smales RJ; Hawthorne WS
    J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):225-7. PubMed ID: 9175349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term cost of direct Class II molar restorations.
    Sjögren P; Halling A
    Swed Dent J; 2002; 26(3):107-14. PubMed ID: 12425224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
    Lyons K;
    N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival time of Class II molar restorations in relation to patient and dental health insurance costs for treatment.
    Sjögren P; Halling A
    Swed Dent J; 2002; 26(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 12462873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vitremer restorative cement for children: three clinicians' observations in three pediatric dental practices.
    Croll TP; Helpin ML; Donly KJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(6):391-8, 374. PubMed ID: 11204061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term survival of repaired amalgams, recemented crowns and gold castings.
    Smales RJ; Hawthorne WS
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 15195723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of glass-ionomer cements used to repair cast restorations.
    Carlson TJ; Naguib EA; Cochran MA; Lund MR
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(5):162-6. PubMed ID: 2098724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.