BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8887237)

  • 1. New formula for estimating fetal weight below 1000 g: comparison with existing formulas.
    Scott F; Beeby P; Abbott J; Edelman D; Boogert A
    J Ultrasound Med; 1996 Oct; 15(10):669-72. PubMed ID: 8887237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regression formula for estimation of fetal weight with use of abdominal circumference and femur length: a prospective study.
    Ferrero A; Maggi E; Giancotti A; Torcia F; Pachì A
    J Ultrasound Med; 1994 Nov; 13(11):823-33. PubMed ID: 7837327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of birth weight by use of ultrasonographic formulas targeted to large-, appropriate-, and small-for-gestational-age fetuses.
    Sabbagha RE; Minogue J; Tamura RK; Hungerford SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Apr; 160(4):854-60; discussion 860-2. PubMed ID: 2653039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume.
    Combs CA; Jaekle RK; Rosenn B; Pope M; Miodovnik M; Siddiqi TA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 8355935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimized Sonographic Weight Estimation of Fetuses over 3500 g Using Biometry-Guided Formula Selection.
    Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Zimmermann R; Kurmanavicius J; Burkhardt T
    Ultraschall Med; 2017 Jan; 38(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 26422668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Weight estimation for low birth weight fetuses and macrosomic fetuses in Chinese population.
    Chen P; Yu J; Li X; Wang Y; Chang C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):599-606. PubMed ID: 21046133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting birth weight by fetal upper-arm volume with use of three-dimensional ultrasonography.
    Liang RI; Chang FM; Yao BL; Chang CH; Yu CH; Ko HC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):632-8. PubMed ID: 9322635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How good is fetal weight estimation using volumetric methods?
    Siemer J; Peter W; Zollver H; Hart N; Müller A; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
    Ultraschall Med; 2008 Aug; 29(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 18484061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting birth weight in fetuses with gastroschisis.
    Zaki MN; Lusk LA; Overcash RT; Rao R; Truong YN; Liebowitz M; Porto M
    J Perinatol; 2018 Feb; 38(2):122-126. PubMed ID: 29266095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new formula for calculating weight in the fetus of < or = 1600 g.
    Schild RL; Fell K; Fimmers R; Gembruch U; Hansmann M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 24(7):775-80. PubMed ID: 15476297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective verification of sonographic fetal weight estimators among term parturients in Uganda.
    Sereke SG; Omara RO; Bongomin F; Nakubulwa S; Kisembo HN
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Mar; 21(1):175. PubMed ID: 33663407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of fetal weight using Hadlock's formulas: Is head circumference an essential parameter?
    Dakwar Shaheen J; Hershkovitz R; Mastrolia SA; Charach R; Eshel R; Tirosh D; Shaheen N; Baron J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec; 243():87-92. PubMed ID: 31678760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
    Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length.
    Weiner CP; Sabbagha RE; Vaisrub N; Socol ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jun; 65(6):812-7. PubMed ID: 3889747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finding the best formula to predict the fetal weight: comparison of 18 formulas.
    Esinler D; Bircan O; Esin S; Sahin EG; Kandemir O; Yalvac S
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2015; 80(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 26183256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Hadlock and INTERGROWTH formulas for calculating estimated fetal weight in a preterm population in France.
    Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Ancel PY; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):476.e1-476.e12. PubMed ID: 30118693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of fetal weight in fetuses with abdominal wall defects: comparison of 2 recent sonographic formulas to the Hadlock formula.
    Nicholas S; Tuuli MG; Dicke J; Macones GA; Stamilio D; Odibo AO
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jul; 29(7):1069-74. PubMed ID: 20587430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
    Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
    J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correctly identifying the macrosomic fetus: improving ultrasonography-based prediction.
    Sokol RJ; Chik L; Dombrowski MP; Zador IE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1489-95. PubMed ID: 10871470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of birth weight by ultrasound in Turkish population. Which formula should be used in Turkey to estimate fetal weight?
    Donma MM; Donma O; Sonmez S
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 31(12):1577-81. PubMed ID: 16344119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.