These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8887409)

  • 1. Porous-coated fixation: the experience.
    Mallory TH
    Orthopedics; 1996 Sep; 19(9):736-8. PubMed ID: 8887409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revision total hip arthroplasty after removal of a fractured well-fixed extensively porous-coated femoral component using a trephine.
    Amanatullah DF; Siman H; Pallante GD; Haber DB; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1192-6. PubMed ID: 26330584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone remodeling after a mean of 10 years in diaphyseal cortical defects repaired with femoral revision using bypass fixation of extensively porous-coated stems with high stiffness.
    Fukui K; Kaneuji A; Sugimori T; Ichiseki T; Matsumoto T
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 May; 25(4):741-7. PubMed ID: 25556779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The removal of porous-coated femoral hip stems.
    Glassman AH; Engh CA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):164-80. PubMed ID: 1446434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Durability of second-generation extensively porous-coated stems in patients age 50 and younger.
    Moyer JA; Metz CM; Callaghan JJ; Hennessy DW; Liu SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 19727992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-Term Comparison of Porous Versus Hydroxyapatite Coated Sleeve of a Modular Cementless Femoral Stem (SROM) in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Tudor FS; Donaldson JR; Rodriguez-Elizalde SR; Cameron HU
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1777-80. PubMed ID: 25971533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Femoral Fixation Methods in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: An 11-Year Retrospective Comparison of 4013 Cases.
    Gaillard-Campbell DM; Gross TP
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2398-2405. PubMed ID: 31248712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimum 8-year follow-up of revision THA with severe femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems and cortical strut allografts.
    Ding ZC; Ling TX; Yuan MC; Qin YZ; Mou P; Wang HY; Zhou ZK
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Apr; 21(1):218. PubMed ID: 32268894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revision total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated modular stem: 5 to 10 years follow-up.
    Lakstein D; Backstein D; Safir O; Kosashvili Y; Gross AE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 May; 468(5):1310-5. PubMed ID: 19533262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survivorship of a low-stiffness extensively porous-coated femoral stem at 10 years.
    Hartzband MA; Glassman AH; Goldberg VM; Jordan LR; Crowninshield RD; Fricka KB; Jordan LC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):433-40. PubMed ID: 19557489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The case for cemented fixation of the femur in every patient.
    Harris WH
    Instr Course Lect; 1994; 43():367-71. PubMed ID: 9097166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term porous-coated cup survivorship using spikes, screws, and press-fitting for initial fixation.
    Engh CA; Hopper RH; Engh CA
    J Arthroplasty; 2004 Oct; 19(7 Suppl 2):54-60. PubMed ID: 15457419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Double coating TI-HAP: 5 years results with the total hip prosthesis alliance.
    Trillaud JM
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1997; 63 Suppl 1():100-1. PubMed ID: 9532861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncemented extensive porous titanium-coated long femoral stem prostheses are effective in treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: A retrospective mid- to long-term follow-up study.
    Wang Q; Li D; Kang P
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2019; 27(2):2309499019857653. PubMed ID: 31232172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of wear and osteolysis in hip replacement using two different coatings of the femoral stem.
    Sanchez-Sotelo J; Lewallen DG; Harmsen WS; Harrington J; Cabanela ME
    Int Orthop; 2004 Aug; 28(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 15118841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study.
    Bolognesi MP; Pietrobon R; Clifford PE; Vail TP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Dec; 86(12):2720-5. PubMed ID: 15590859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proximally versus fully porous-coated femoral stems: a multicenter randomized trial.
    MacDonald SJ; Rosenzweig S; Guerin JS; McCalden RW; Bohm ER; Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH; Barrack RL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):424-32. PubMed ID: 19777316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revision total hip arthroplasty using hydroxylapatite-coated implants.
    Geesink R; Hoefnagels N
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1997; 63 Suppl 1():77-80. PubMed ID: 9532857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survivorship of uncemented proximally porous-coated femoral components.
    Berry DJ; Harmsen WS; Ilstrup D; Lewallen DG; Cabanela ME
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):168-77. PubMed ID: 7554627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High survival of uncemented proximally porous-coated titanium alloy femoral stems in osteoporotic bone.
    Meding JB; Galley MR; Ritter MA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):441-7. PubMed ID: 19727996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.