These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8887527)

  • 1. Six methods to assess potential radioactive air emissions from a stack.
    Barnett JM; Davis WE
    Health Phys; 1996 Nov; 71(5):773-8. PubMed ID: 8887527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Current Center of Site Annual Neshap Dose Modeling at the Savannah River Site with Other Assessment Methods.
    Minter KM; Jannik GT; Stagich BH; Dixon KL; Newton JR
    Health Phys; 2018 Apr; 114(4):408-413. PubMed ID: 29481531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's CAP88 PC Versions 3.0 and 4.0.
    Jannik T; Farfan EB; Dixon K; Newton J; Sailors C; Johnson L; Moore K; Stahman R
    Health Phys; 2015 Aug; 109(2 Suppl 2):S169-75. PubMed ID: 26102326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A best fit approach to estimating multiple diffuse source terms using ambient air monitoring data and an air dispersion model.
    MacQueen D; Bertoldo N; Wegrecki A
    Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S140-8. PubMed ID: 23803667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of CAP88 at Department of Energy sites.
    Snyder S; Vázquez G; Hay T
    Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S164-8. PubMed ID: 23803670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of radionuclide databases in CAP88 mainframe version 1.0 and Windows-based version 3.0.
    LaBone ED; Farfán EB; Lee PL; Jannik GT; Donnelly EH; Foley TQ
    Health Phys; 2009 Sep; 97(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 19667807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation test for CAP88 predictions of tritium dispersion at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
    Michelotti E; Green A; Whicker J; Eisele W; Fuehne D; McNaughton M
    Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S176-81. PubMed ID: 23803672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of CAP88 PC Ver. 3.0 and MAXDOSE dose assessment models involving co-located stack releases at the Savannah River site.
    Farfán E; Jannik GT; Lee P; Powell A
    Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S158-63. PubMed ID: 23803669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oak Ridge Reservation Environmental Protection Rad Neshaps Radionuclide Inventory Web Database and Rad Neshaps Source and Dose Database.
    Scofield PA; Smith LL; Johnson DN
    Health Phys; 2017 Jul; 113(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 28542014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Location Modification Factors for Potential Dose Estimation.
    Snyder SF; Barnett JM
    Health Phys; 2017 Jul; 113(1):73-77. PubMed ID: 28542013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose Comparisons for a Site-specific Representative Person Using the Age-dependent Dose Coefficients in CAP88-PC Version 4.
    Stagich BH; Moore KR; Newton JR; Dixon KL; Jannik GT
    Health Phys; 2017 Apr; 112(4):338-342. PubMed ID: 28234692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation and measurements of radioactive air emission and off-site doses at SLAC.
    Chan I; Liu J; Tran H
    Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S115-8. PubMed ID: 23803664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of CAP88 PC to infer differences in the chemical form of 129I emitted from a fuel reprocessing facility.
    Fritz BG; Phillips NR
    J Environ Radioact; 2013 Jun; 120():1-5. PubMed ID: 23395750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One perspective on stakeholder involvement at Hanford.
    Martin T
    Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):536-8. PubMed ID: 21979534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of Routine Environmental Monitoring Data to Establish a Dose-based Compliance System for a Low-level Radioactive Waste Disposal Site.
    Rood AS; Grogan HA; Mohler HJ; Rocco JR; Caffrey EA; Mangini C; Cartwright J; Matthews T; Shaw C; Packard ME; Till JE
    Health Phys; 2020 Jan; 118(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 31703016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods to Track Effective Doses from Airborne Radioactive Emissions for Compliance with 40 CFR 61, SUBPART H.
    Harshman AM; McCarter WL
    Health Phys; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39051999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An update on a spreadsheet method for computing consequences to the nearest maximally exposed offsite individual in compliance with DOE-STD-3009-94.
    Vickers L
    Health Phys; 2015 Feb; 108(1 Suppl 1):S42-9. PubMed ID: 25551652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monitoring iodine-129 in air and milk samples collected near the Hanford Site: an investigation of historical iodine monitoring data.
    Fritz BG; Patton GW
    J Environ Radioact; 2006; 86(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 16125287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Worker and environmental protection issues in the remediation of an abandoned source manufacturing facility.
    Hoffman DE
    Health Phys; 2003 Feb; 84(2 Suppl):S30-6. PubMed ID: 12564344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of dose results from the Clean Air Act Assessment Package-1988, personal computer (CAP88-PC), version 3 to previous versions.
    Rhoads K; Snyder S; Staven L
    Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S125-39. PubMed ID: 23803666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.