103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8888224)
1. Upper gastrointestinal tract and abdomen: water as an orally administered contrast agent for helical CT.
Winter TC; Ager JD; Nghiem HV; Hill RS; Harrison SD; Freeny PC
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):365-70. PubMed ID: 8888224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Francis IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abdominal helical CT: milk as a low-attenuation oral contrast agent.
Thompson SE; Raptopoulos V; Sheiman RL; McNicholas MM; Prassopoulos P
Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):870-5. PubMed ID: 10352618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hepatic enhancement and metastatic lesion conspicuity on CT scans: influence of intravenous glucagon and oral CT contrast material.
Warshauer DM; Wehmueller MD; Molina PL; Muller KE; DeLuca MC; Lee JK
Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):394-8. PubMed ID: 9015064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Positive and negative oral contrast agents for combined abdominal and pelvic helical CT: first iodinated agent and second water.
Matsuoka Y; Masumoto T; Koga H; Suzuki K; Ushimi T; Terada H; Tamura A; Yokoyama Y; Abe K; Kamata N
Radiat Med; 2000; 18(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 10972554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new technique of administration of oral contrast material for abdominal CT: the drip ingestion method.
Rhim HC; Bae OK; Lee HS; Song SY; Kim YS; Koh BH; Cho OK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):495-7. PubMed ID: 9242762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Low-attenuation oral GI contrast agents in abdominal-pelvic computed tomography.
Hebert JJ; Taylor AJ; Winter TC; Reichelderfer M; Weichert JP
Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 16252139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Water as a contrast medium: a re-evaluation using the multidetector-row computed tomography.
Makarawo TP; Negussie E; Malde S; Tilak J; Gayagoy J; Watson J; Francis F; Lincoln D; Jacobs MJ
Am Surg; 2013 Jul; 79(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 23816008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of simethicone-coated cellulose as a negative oral contrast agent for abdominal CT.
Sahani DV; Jhaveri KS; D'souza RV; Varghese JC; Halpern E; Harisinghani MG; Hahn PF; Saini S
Acad Radiol; 2003 May; 10(5):491-6. PubMed ID: 12755536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of computed tomographic enterography with an orally administered lactulose solution in clinically normal dogs.
Keh S; Sohn J; Choi M; Lee N; Jang J; Kim H; Chang D; Choi M; Yoon J
Am J Vet Res; 2016 Apr; 77(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 27027835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intravenous glucagon: does it optimize evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract on helical CT?
Eisenstat RS; Gold BM; Goffner L; Fruauff AA; Pollack S; Katz DS
Clin Imaging; 2002; 26(6):408-13. PubMed ID: 12427437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oral contrast agents for CT of abdominal trauma in pediatric patients: a comparison of dilute hypaque and water.
Halsted MJ; Racadio JM; Emery KH; Kreymerman P; Poe SA; Bean JA; Donnelly LF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jun; 182(6):1555-9. PubMed ID: 15150008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 2 different protocols for ingestion of low-attenuating oral contrast agent for multidetector computed tomography of the abdomen.
Meindl TM; Hagl E; Reiser MF; Mueller-Lisse UG
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 17414757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of bowel distention and bowel wall appearance by using neutral oral contrast agent for multi-detector row CT.
Megibow AJ; Babb JS; Hecht EM; Cho JJ; Houston C; Boruch MM; Williams AB
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 16293806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computed tomographic positive contrast peritoneography.
Roub LW; Drayer BP; Orr DP; Oh KS
Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):699-704. PubMed ID: 441375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Intestinal contrasting in abdominal computed tomography].
Schunk K; Wiessner J; Schadmand S; Kaltenborn H; Düber C; Brunier A
Rofo; 1992 May; 156(5):443-7. PubMed ID: 1596547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of an experimental low-attenuation gastrointestinal contrast agent for CT imaging of intestinal ischemia in an animal model.
Spilde JM; Lee FT; Chosy SG; Krupinski EA; Kuhlman JE; Yandow DR
Acad Radiol; 1999 Feb; 6(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 12680431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Depiction of normal gastrointestinal anatomy with MDCT: comparison of low- and high-attenuation oral contrast media.
Erturk SM; Mortelé KJ; Oliva MR; Ichikawa T; Silverman SG; Cantisani V; Pagliara E; Ros PR
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 17604930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the effect of positive and negative oral contrast agents on (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan.
Sun XG; Huang G; Liu JJ; Wan LR
Hell J Nucl Med; 2009; 12(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 19675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the gastrointestinal tract in clinically normal alpacas and llamas.
Stieger-Vanegas SM; Cebra CK
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2013 Jan; 242(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 23276105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
