567 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8888254)
1. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging.
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Brix G; Essig M; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pelvic lesions in patients with treated cervical carcinoma: efficacy of pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR images in distinguishing recurrent tumors from benign conditions.
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Schaeffer U; Knopp MV; Brix G; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Essig M; van Kaick G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):401-8. PubMed ID: 8553955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Carcinoma of the cervix: value of plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in assessing degree of invasiveness.
Sironi S; De Cobelli F; Scarfone G; Colombo E; Bolis G; Ferrari A; DelMaschio A
Radiology; 1993 Sep; 188(3):797-801. PubMed ID: 8351350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stromal invasion by carcinoma of the cervix: assessment with dynamic MR imaging.
Seki H; Azumi R; Kimura M; Sakai K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1579-85. PubMed ID: 9168730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parametrial invasion in cervical carcinoma: evaluation of detection at MR imaging with fat suppression.
Scheidler J; Heuck AF; Steinborn M; Kimmig R; Reiser MF
Radiology; 1998 Jan; 206(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 9423661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of staging rectal tumors with contrast-enhanced transrectal MR imaging.
Vogl TJ; Pegios W; Mack MG; Hünerbein M; Hintze R; Adler A; Lobbeck H; Hammerstingl R; Wust P; Schlag P; Felix R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1427-34. PubMed ID: 9168702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preliminary experience with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging for uterine neoplasms.
Hirano Y; Kubo K; Hirai Y; Okada S; Yamada K; Sawano S; Yamashita T; Hiramatsu Y
Radiographics; 1992 Mar; 12(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 1561414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histopathology of uterine cervical carcinoma: diagnostic comparison of endorectal surface coil and standard body coil MRI.
Kaji Y; Sugimura K; Kitao M; Ishida T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(5):785-92. PubMed ID: 8089330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Carcinoma of the uterus: use of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging.
Hricak H; Hamm B; Semelka RC; Cann CE; Nauert T; Secaf E; Stern JL; Wolf KJ
Radiology; 1991 Oct; 181(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 1887062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Parametrial infiltration of cervix carcinoma: diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted SE sequences at 1.5 tesla].
Scheidler J; Heuck A; Wencke K; Kimmig R; Müller-Lisse U; Reiser M
Rofo; 1997 Apr; 166(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 9198495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results.
Jager GJ; Ruijter ET; van de Kaa CA; de la Rosette JJ; Oosterhof GO; Thornbury JR; Ruijs SH; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 9169683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images.
Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Invasive cervix carcinoma (pT2b-pT4a). Value of conventional and pharmacokinetic magnetic resonance tomography (MRI) in comparison with extensive cross sections and histopathologic findings].
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Essig M; Brix G; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G
Radiologe; 1997 Feb; 37(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 9173426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical invasion of endometrial carcinoma--evaluation by parasagittal MR imaging.
Murakami T; Kurachi H; Nakamura H; Tsuda K; Miyake A; Tomoda K; Hori S; Kozuka T
Acta Radiol; 1995 May; 36(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 7742116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Staging urinary bladder cancer after transurethral biopsy: value of fast dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Barentsz JO; Jager GJ; van Vierzen PB; Witjes JA; Strijk SP; Peters H; Karssemeijer N; Ruijs SH
Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):185-93. PubMed ID: 8816542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rectal cancer: MR imaging in local staging--is gadolinium-based contrast material helpful?
Vliegen RF; Beets GL; von Meyenfeldt MF; Kessels AG; Lemaire EE; van Engelshoven JM; Beets-Tan RG
Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):179-88. PubMed ID: 15550372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bladder tumors: staging with gadolinium-enhanced oblique MR imaging.
Narumi Y; Kadota T; Inoue E; Kuriyama K; Fujita M; Hosomi N; Sawai Y; Kuroda M; Kotake T; Kuroda C
Radiology; 1993 Apr; 187(1):145-50. PubMed ID: 8451401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Carcinoma of the cervix: dynamic MR imaging.
Yamashita Y; Takahashi M; Sawada T; Miyazaki K; Okamura H
Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):643-8. PubMed ID: 1535875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
