These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
563 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8888254)
1. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging. Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Brix G; Essig M; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pelvic lesions in patients with treated cervical carcinoma: efficacy of pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR images in distinguishing recurrent tumors from benign conditions. Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Schaeffer U; Knopp MV; Brix G; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Essig M; van Kaick G AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):401-8. PubMed ID: 8553955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Carcinoma of the cervix: value of plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in assessing degree of invasiveness. Sironi S; De Cobelli F; Scarfone G; Colombo E; Bolis G; Ferrari A; DelMaschio A Radiology; 1993 Sep; 188(3):797-801. PubMed ID: 8351350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stromal invasion by carcinoma of the cervix: assessment with dynamic MR imaging. Seki H; Azumi R; Kimura M; Sakai K AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1579-85. PubMed ID: 9168730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parametrial invasion in cervical carcinoma: evaluation of detection at MR imaging with fat suppression. Scheidler J; Heuck AF; Steinborn M; Kimmig R; Reiser MF Radiology; 1998 Jan; 206(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 9423661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of staging rectal tumors with contrast-enhanced transrectal MR imaging. Vogl TJ; Pegios W; Mack MG; Hünerbein M; Hintze R; Adler A; Lobbeck H; Hammerstingl R; Wust P; Schlag P; Felix R AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1427-34. PubMed ID: 9168702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histopathology of uterine cervical carcinoma: diagnostic comparison of endorectal surface coil and standard body coil MRI. Kaji Y; Sugimura K; Kitao M; Ishida T J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(5):785-92. PubMed ID: 8089330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Carcinoma of the uterus: use of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging. Hricak H; Hamm B; Semelka RC; Cann CE; Nauert T; Secaf E; Stern JL; Wolf KJ Radiology; 1991 Oct; 181(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 1887062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Parametrial infiltration of cervix carcinoma: diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted SE sequences at 1.5 tesla]. Scheidler J; Heuck A; Wencke K; Kimmig R; Müller-Lisse U; Reiser M Rofo; 1997 Apr; 166(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 9198495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results. Jager GJ; Ruijter ET; van de Kaa CA; de la Rosette JJ; Oosterhof GO; Thornbury JR; Ruijs SH; Barentsz JO Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 9169683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images. Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Invasive cervix carcinoma (pT2b-pT4a). Value of conventional and pharmacokinetic magnetic resonance tomography (MRI) in comparison with extensive cross sections and histopathologic findings]. Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Essig M; Brix G; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G Radiologe; 1997 Feb; 37(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 9173426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical invasion of endometrial carcinoma--evaluation by parasagittal MR imaging. Murakami T; Kurachi H; Nakamura H; Tsuda K; Miyake A; Tomoda K; Hori S; Kozuka T Acta Radiol; 1995 May; 36(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 7742116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Staging urinary bladder cancer after transurethral biopsy: value of fast dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Barentsz JO; Jager GJ; van Vierzen PB; Witjes JA; Strijk SP; Peters H; Karssemeijer N; Ruijs SH Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):185-93. PubMed ID: 8816542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images. Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rectal cancer: MR imaging in local staging--is gadolinium-based contrast material helpful? Vliegen RF; Beets GL; von Meyenfeldt MF; Kessels AG; Lemaire EE; van Engelshoven JM; Beets-Tan RG Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):179-88. PubMed ID: 15550372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bladder tumors: staging with gadolinium-enhanced oblique MR imaging. Narumi Y; Kadota T; Inoue E; Kuriyama K; Fujita M; Hosomi N; Sawai Y; Kuroda M; Kotake T; Kuroda C Radiology; 1993 Apr; 187(1):145-50. PubMed ID: 8451401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Carcinoma of the cervix: dynamic MR imaging. Yamashita Y; Takahashi M; Sawada T; Miyazaki K; Okamura H Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):643-8. PubMed ID: 1535875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging. Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]