These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8888396)

  • 1. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Measures of screen-film performance.
    Haus AG
    Radiographics; 1996 Sep; 16(5):1165-81. PubMed ID: 8888396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
    Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
    Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographic mottle: a comprehensive theory.
    Barnes GT
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(5):656-67. PubMed ID: 7155067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Monte Carlo evaluation of noise and resolution properties of granular phosphor screens.
    Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):859-74. PubMed ID: 19141882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physics and chemistry of film and processing.
    Kitts EI
    Radiographics; 1996 Nov; 16(6):1467-79; quiz 1464-5. PubMed ID: 8946547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of the quality of screen-film radiographic systems: physical principles and methods of measurement].
    Borasi G; Berardi P; Ferretti PP; Piccagli V
    Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 2236696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: fluoroscopy: optical coupling and the video system.
    Van Lysel MS
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(6):1769-86. PubMed ID: 11112828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The parameters of image quality of a novel ultra high resolution film-screen system].
    Beutel J; Mickewich DJ; Issler SL; Shaw R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1994 Jan; 4(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 8136386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of film-screen combinations in contrast-detail diagram and with interactive image analysis. 3: Trimodal histograms of gray scale distribution in bar groups of lead pattern images].
    Hagemann G; Eichbaum G; Stamm G
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 May; 8(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 9645256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physics overview of screen-film radiography.
    Ritenour ER
    Radiographics; 1996 Jul; 16(4):903-16. PubMed ID: 8835979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: X-ray image intensifiers for fluoroscopy.
    Wang J; Blackburn TJ
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(5):1471-7. PubMed ID: 10992034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technical aspects of screen-film radiography, film processing, and quality control.
    Gray JE
    Radiographics; 1997; 17(1):177-87. PubMed ID: 9017807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser.
    Verdun FR; Pachoud M; Bergmann D; Buhr E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
    Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The choice of radiographic film-screen systems: quality evaluation and purchasing specifications drafting. Report on A.I.F.B. Working Group activity.
    Borasi G; Bregant P; Crespi A; De Denaro M; Ferretti PP; De Guarrini F; Levrero F; Mozzo P; Novario R; Pedroli G
    Radiol Med; 1993 May; 85(5):662-7. PubMed ID: 8327771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
    Huda W
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.