These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8888477)

  • 1. Design considerations for estimation of exposure effects on disease risk, using aggregate data studies.
    Sheppard L; Prentice RL; Rossing MA
    Stat Med; 1996 Sep 15-30; 15(17-18):1849-58. PubMed ID: 8888477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the accommodation of disease rate correlations in aggregate data studies of disease risk factors.
    Anderson AB; Prentice RL
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1527-40. PubMed ID: 9883550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
    Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the reliability and precision of within- and between- population estimates of relative rate parameters.
    Sheppard L; Prentice RL
    Biometrics; 1995 Sep; 51(3):853-63. PubMed ID: 7548704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overcoming ecologic bias using the two-phase study design.
    Wakefield J; Haneuse SJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 167(8):908-16. PubMed ID: 18270370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factoring vs linear modeling in rate estimation: a simulation study of relative accuracy.
    Maldonado G; Greenland S
    Epidemiology; 1998 Jul; 9(4):432-5. PubMed ID: 9647908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical methods for epidemiologic studies of the health effects of air pollution.
    Navidi W; Thomas D; Langholz B; Stram D
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 1999 May; (86):1-50; discussion 51-6. PubMed ID: 10465799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential recall bias and spurious associations in case/control studies.
    Barry D
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(23):2603-16. PubMed ID: 8961466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linkage failures in ecological studies.
    Nurminen M
    World Health Stat Q; 1995; 48(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 8585237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of bias in familial risk estimates: a study of common cancers using Swedish population-based registers.
    Leu M; Reilly M; Czene K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1318-25. PubMed ID: 18780865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inclusion of risk factor covariates in a segregation analysis of a population-based sample of 426 breast cancer families.
    Grabrick DM; Anderson VE; King RA; Kushi LH; Sellers TA
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 16(2):150-64. PubMed ID: 10030398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Within- and between-cohort variation in measured macronutrient intakes, taking account of measurement errors, in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study.
    Ferrari P; Kaaks R; Fahey MT; Slimani N; Day NE; Pera G; Boshuizen HC; Roddam A; Boeing H; Nagel G; Thiebaut A; Orfanos P; Krogh V; Braaten T; Riboli E;
    Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Oct; 160(8):814-22. PubMed ID: 15466504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
    Westhoff CL
    Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Epidemiologic data on radiation-induced breast cancer].
    Telle-Lamberton M
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Aug; 56(4):235-43. PubMed ID: 18672338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Survival curve estimation with partial non-random exposure information.
    Brookmeyer R; Curriero FC
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(18):2671-83. PubMed ID: 12228884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health-exposure modeling and the ecological fallacy.
    Wakefield J; Shaddick G
    Biostatistics; 2006 Jul; 7(3):438-55. PubMed ID: 16428258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat-breast cancer relationship.
    Freedman LS; Potischman N; Kipnis V; Midthune D; Schatzkin A; Thompson FE; Troiano RP; Prentice R; Patterson R; Carroll R; Subar AF
    Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 35(4):1011-21. PubMed ID: 16672309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The interpretation of exposure effect estimates in chronic air pollution studies.
    Haneuse S; Wakefield J; Sheppard L
    Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(16):3172-87. PubMed ID: 17225212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.