These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8888653)
1. The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: critique of Just and Carpenter (1992). Waters GS; Caplan D Psychol Rev; 1996 Oct; 103(4):761-72. PubMed ID: 8888653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The capacity theory of comprehension: new frontiers of evidence and arguments. Just MA; Carpenter PA; Keller TA Psychol Rev; 1996 Oct; 103(4):773-80. PubMed ID: 8888654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Waters GS; Caplan D Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Feb; 49(1):51-75. PubMed ID: 8920099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Thematic analysis in agrammatic comprehension: syntactic structures and task demands. Friederici AD; Frazier L Brain Lang; 1992 Jan; 42(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 1547466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. "That man's father is my father's son": the roles of structure, strategy, and working memory in solving convoluted verbal problems. Casey PJ Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):506-18. PubMed ID: 8350742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relational processing and working memory capacity in comprehension of relative clause sentences. Andrews G; Birney D; Halford GS Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1325-40. PubMed ID: 17225512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Just MA; Carpenter PA Psychol Rev; 1992 Jan; 99(1):122-49. PubMed ID: 1546114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. MacDonald MC; Just MA; Carpenter PA Cogn Psychol; 1992 Jan; 24(1):56-98. PubMed ID: 1537232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Working memory, text comprehension, and propositional reasoning: a new Semantic Anaphora WM test. Carriedo N; ElosĂșa MR; GarcĂa-Madruga JA Span J Psychol; 2011 May; 14(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 21568163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of six multinomial models of conscious and unconscious processes with the recall-recognition paradigm. Bellezza FS J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):779-96. PubMed ID: 14516213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reassessing working memory: comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). MacDonald MC; Christiansen MH Psychol Rev; 2002 Jan; 109(1):35-54; discussion 55-74. PubMed ID: 11863041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Van Orden GC; Pennington BF; Stone GO Psychol Rev; 1990 Oct; 97(4):488-522. PubMed ID: 2247539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. Bock K; Loebell H; Morey R Psychol Rev; 1992 Jan; 99(1):150-71. PubMed ID: 1546115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations. Hagoort P J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Children's verbal working memory: role of processing complexity in predicting spoken sentence comprehension. Magimairaj BM; Montgomery JW J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):669-82. PubMed ID: 22223892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Lewis RL; Vasishth S; Van Dyke JA Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Oct; 10(10):447-54. PubMed ID: 16949330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modality effects in sentence recall. Goolkasian P; Foos PW; Eaton M J Gen Psychol; 2009 Apr; 136(2):205-23. PubMed ID: 19350835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]