230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8889131)
1. Establishing standards for criminal forensic reports: an empirical analysis.
Borum R; Grisso T
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(3):297-317. PubMed ID: 8889131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial.
Mossman D; Noffsinger SG; Ash P; Frierson RL; Gerbasi J; Hackett M; Lewis CF; Pinals DA; Scott CL; Sieg KG; Wall BW; Zonana HV;
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72. PubMed ID: 18083992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making.
Pitt SE; Brandt JD; Tellefsen C; Janofsky JS; Cohen ME; Bettis ED; Rappeport JR
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 9148886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Opinion formation in evaluating sanity at the time of the offense: an examination of 5175 pre-trial evaluations.
Warren JI; Murrie DC; Chauhan P; Dietz PE; Morris J
Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 15048857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Competency to stand trial evaluations: a study of actual practice in two states.
Robbins E; Waters J; Herbert P
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 9460035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Criminal offense, psychiatric diagnosis, and psycholegal opinion: an analysis of 894 pretrial referrals.
Warren JI; Fitch WL; Dietz PE; Rosenfeld BD
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 2039849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conceptualizing and characterizing accuracy in assessments of competence to stand trial.
Mossman D
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(3):340-51. PubMed ID: 18802182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing competency competently: toward a rational standard for competency-to-stand-trial assessments.
Morris GH; Haroun AM; Naimark D
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):231-45. PubMed ID: 15515910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A confusion of tongues: competence, insanity, psychiatry, and the law.
Gutheil TG
Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jun; 50(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 10375145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Commentary: A road map for research in restoration of competency to stand trial.
Scott CL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 12817841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
Meynen G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychiatric aspects of criminal responsibility: insanity and mitigation.
Burrows M; Reid WH
J Psychiatr Pract; 2011 Nov; 17(6):429-31. PubMed ID: 22108401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond competence and sanity: the influence of pretrial evaluation on case disposition.
Warren JI; Rosenfeld B; Fitch WL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):379-88. PubMed ID: 7841509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychiatry and the death penalty.
Scott CL
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2006 Sep; 29(3):791-804. PubMed ID: 16904512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations.
Warren JI; Murrie DC; Stejskal W; Colwell LH; Morris J; Chauhan P; Dietz P
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):113-32. PubMed ID: 16557643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Medical expert assessment in psychiatry].
Pietzcker A
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):623-6. PubMed ID: 9064935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting restorability of incompetent criminal defendants.
Mossman D
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 17389343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
