BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

619 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8889954)

  • 1. Variability and consistency of electric and magnetic field occupational exposure measurements.
    Bracken TD; Patterson RM
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1996; 6(3):355-74. PubMed ID: 8889954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exposure assessment for power frequency electric and magnetic fields.
    Bracken TD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Apr; 54(4):165-77. PubMed ID: 8480632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects function analysis of ELF magnetic field exposure in the electric utility work environment.
    Zhang J; Nair I; Sahl J
    Bioelectromagnetics; 1997; 18(5):365-75. PubMed ID: 9209718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An integrated job exposure matrix for electrical exposures of utility workers.
    Bracken TD; Kavet R; Patterson RM; Fordyce TA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Aug; 6(8):499-509. PubMed ID: 19452311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of magnetic field exposures for a mortality study at a uranium enrichment plant.
    Wenzl TB
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(6):818-24. PubMed ID: 10635549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Occupational exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields in workers employed in various jobs].
    Gobba F; Roccatto L; Vandelli AM; Besutti G; Ghersi R; Nicolini O
    Med Lav; 2004; 95(6):475-85. PubMed ID: 15732257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of a job-exposure matrix for assessment of utility worker exposure to magnetic fields.
    Johansen C; Raaschou-Nielsen O; Skotte J; Thomsen BL; Olsen JH
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Apr; 17(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 11942674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Future needs of occupational epidemiology of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: review and recommendations.
    Kheifets L; Bowman JD; Checkoway H; Feychting M; Harrington JM; Kavet R; Marsh G; Mezei G; Renew DC; van Wijngaarden E
    Occup Environ Med; 2009 Feb; 66(2):72-80. PubMed ID: 18805878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A system linking occupation history questionnaire data and magnetic field monitoring data.
    Burau KD; Huang B; Whitehead LW; Delclos GM; Downs TD
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1998; 8(2):231-52. PubMed ID: 9577753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results of a multisite study of U.S. residential magnetic fields.
    Rankin RF; Bracken TD; Senior RS; Kavet R; Montgomery JH
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2002; 12(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 11859429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of biological effects, dosimetric models, and exposure assessment related to ELF electric- and magnetic-field guidelines.
    Kavet R; Stuchly MA; Bailey WH; Bracken TD
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Dec; 16(12):1118-38. PubMed ID: 11783873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic-field exposures of cable splicers in electrical network distribution vaults.
    Bracken TD; Rankin RF; Senior RS; Kavet R; Geissinger LG
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Mar; 16(3):369-79. PubMed ID: 11297051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Biological and health effects on electric and magnetic fields at extremely low frequencies].
    Torregrossa MV
    Ann Ig; 2005; 17(5):441-53. PubMed ID: 16353681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heterogeneity in sources of exposure variability among groups of workers exposed to inorganic mercury.
    Symanski E; Sällsten G; Chan W; Barregård L
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Nov; 45(8):677-87. PubMed ID: 11718663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic field personal exposure monitors.
    McDevitt JJ; Breysse PN; Bowman JD; Sassone DM
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2002; 12(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11859428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomarkers in Czech workers exposed to 1,3-butadiene: a transitional epidemiologic study.
    Albertini RJ; Srám RJ; Vacek PM; Lynch J; Nicklas JA; van Sittert NJ; Boogaard PJ; Henderson RF; Swenberg JA; Tates AD; Ward JB; Wright M; Ammenheuser MM; Binkova B; Blackwell W; de Zwart FA; Krako D; Krone J; Megens H; Musilová P; Rajská G; Ranasinghe A; Rosenblatt JI; Rössner P; Rubes J; Sullivan L; Upton P; Zwinderman AH
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2003 Jun; (116):1-141; discussion 143-62. PubMed ID: 12931846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occupational and residential 60-Hz electromagnetic fields and high-frequency electric transients: exposure assessment using a new dosimeter.
    Deadman JE; Camus M; Armstrong BG; Héroux P; Cyr D; Plante M; Thériault G
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1988 Aug; 49(8):409-19. PubMed ID: 3177219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electric and magnetic fields at power frequencies.
    Miller AB; Green LM
    Chronic Dis Can; 2010; 29 Suppl 1():69-83. PubMed ID: 21199600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Health effects of occupational exposure to static magnetic fields used in magnetic resonance imaging: a review].
    Franco G; Perduri R; Murolo A
    Med Lav; 2008; 99(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 18254536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Within-day variability of magnetic fields among electric utility workers: consequences for measurement strategies.
    van der Woord MP; Kromhout H; Barregård L; Jonsson P
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 10772612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.