These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

614 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8889954)

  • 1. Variability and consistency of electric and magnetic field occupational exposure measurements.
    Bracken TD; Patterson RM
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1996; 6(3):355-74. PubMed ID: 8889954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exposure assessment for power frequency electric and magnetic fields.
    Bracken TD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Apr; 54(4):165-77. PubMed ID: 8480632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects function analysis of ELF magnetic field exposure in the electric utility work environment.
    Zhang J; Nair I; Sahl J
    Bioelectromagnetics; 1997; 18(5):365-75. PubMed ID: 9209718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An integrated job exposure matrix for electrical exposures of utility workers.
    Bracken TD; Kavet R; Patterson RM; Fordyce TA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Aug; 6(8):499-509. PubMed ID: 19452311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of magnetic field exposures for a mortality study at a uranium enrichment plant.
    Wenzl TB
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(6):818-24. PubMed ID: 10635549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Occupational exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields in workers employed in various jobs].
    Gobba F; Roccatto L; Vandelli AM; Besutti G; Ghersi R; Nicolini O
    Med Lav; 2004; 95(6):475-85. PubMed ID: 15732257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of a job-exposure matrix for assessment of utility worker exposure to magnetic fields.
    Johansen C; Raaschou-Nielsen O; Skotte J; Thomsen BL; Olsen JH
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Apr; 17(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 11942674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Future needs of occupational epidemiology of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: review and recommendations.
    Kheifets L; Bowman JD; Checkoway H; Feychting M; Harrington JM; Kavet R; Marsh G; Mezei G; Renew DC; van Wijngaarden E
    Occup Environ Med; 2009 Feb; 66(2):72-80. PubMed ID: 18805878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A system linking occupation history questionnaire data and magnetic field monitoring data.
    Burau KD; Huang B; Whitehead LW; Delclos GM; Downs TD
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1998; 8(2):231-52. PubMed ID: 9577753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results of a multisite study of U.S. residential magnetic fields.
    Rankin RF; Bracken TD; Senior RS; Kavet R; Montgomery JH
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2002; 12(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 11859429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of biological effects, dosimetric models, and exposure assessment related to ELF electric- and magnetic-field guidelines.
    Kavet R; Stuchly MA; Bailey WH; Bracken TD
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Dec; 16(12):1118-38. PubMed ID: 11783873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic-field exposures of cable splicers in electrical network distribution vaults.
    Bracken TD; Rankin RF; Senior RS; Kavet R; Geissinger LG
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Mar; 16(3):369-79. PubMed ID: 11297051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Biological and health effects on electric and magnetic fields at extremely low frequencies].
    Torregrossa MV
    Ann Ig; 2005; 17(5):441-53. PubMed ID: 16353681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heterogeneity in sources of exposure variability among groups of workers exposed to inorganic mercury.
    Symanski E; Sällsten G; Chan W; Barregård L
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Nov; 45(8):677-87. PubMed ID: 11718663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic field personal exposure monitors.
    McDevitt JJ; Breysse PN; Bowman JD; Sassone DM
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2002; 12(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11859428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomarkers in Czech workers exposed to 1,3-butadiene: a transitional epidemiologic study.
    Albertini RJ; Srám RJ; Vacek PM; Lynch J; Nicklas JA; van Sittert NJ; Boogaard PJ; Henderson RF; Swenberg JA; Tates AD; Ward JB; Wright M; Ammenheuser MM; Binkova B; Blackwell W; de Zwart FA; Krako D; Krone J; Megens H; Musilová P; Rajská G; Ranasinghe A; Rosenblatt JI; Rössner P; Rubes J; Sullivan L; Upton P; Zwinderman AH
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2003 Jun; (116):1-141; discussion 143-62. PubMed ID: 12931846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occupational and residential 60-Hz electromagnetic fields and high-frequency electric transients: exposure assessment using a new dosimeter.
    Deadman JE; Camus M; Armstrong BG; Héroux P; Cyr D; Plante M; Thériault G
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1988 Aug; 49(8):409-19. PubMed ID: 3177219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electric and magnetic fields at power frequencies.
    Miller AB; Green LM
    Chronic Dis Can; 2010; 29 Suppl 1():69-83. PubMed ID: 21199600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Health effects of occupational exposure to static magnetic fields used in magnetic resonance imaging: a review].
    Franco G; Perduri R; Murolo A
    Med Lav; 2008; 99(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 18254536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Within-day variability of magnetic fields among electric utility workers: consequences for measurement strategies.
    van der Woord MP; Kromhout H; Barregård L; Jonsson P
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 10772612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.